The prevalence and patterns of rationing of nursing care in acute care settings
Date Issued
March 2018
Abstract
When resources are insufficient, nurses are forced to ration their attention between care activities with the potential consequence
of withholding or failing to carry out certain nursing activities. As a result fundamental patient needs may not be fulfilled leading
to adverse patient outcomes (ie: falls, and nosocomial infections). Evidence suggests that individual nurse and patient related
characteristics as well as environmental factors can initiate rationing. The aim of the study was to describe and compare the frequency
of implicit rationing of nursing care in different clinical settings in Cyprus and identify any relevant environmental factors. Three
descriptive, correlational cross-sectional studies were involved. Data were collected using the BERCNA questionnaire from 393
nurses working in medical and surgical units. One hundred and fifty seven nurses working in oncology units responded to a ‘Missed
Care’ questionnaire, and data were also data collected from 540 nurses in 14 general medical and surgical wards across five public
hospitals, who responded to the question task undone (TU-13) as part of the RN4CAST-cy project. The response rate of all the studies
was >60% of the samples. Despite the the use of three different instrumentations, there were similar patterns of implicit rationing.
Findings reveal that activities described as frequently or always left undone were: mouth care (61.1%); Comfort/talk with patients
(58.3%), educating patient or families (54.0 %); emotional and psychological support (32.5%); and reviewing patient documentation
(31%). Environmental dimensions, such as ‘teamwork communication about patients’ were associated with a decreased level of
rationing. Nursing care left is a significant problem in acute care hospitals. Rationing of care creates two problems. Firstly it leaves
patients vulnerable to unmet educational, emotional, and psychological needs. Secondly, it leaves nurses vulnerable to unmet received
knowledge as they lack sufficient information about the patient situation and this may lead to false decisions in prioritising care.
of withholding or failing to carry out certain nursing activities. As a result fundamental patient needs may not be fulfilled leading
to adverse patient outcomes (ie: falls, and nosocomial infections). Evidence suggests that individual nurse and patient related
characteristics as well as environmental factors can initiate rationing. The aim of the study was to describe and compare the frequency
of implicit rationing of nursing care in different clinical settings in Cyprus and identify any relevant environmental factors. Three
descriptive, correlational cross-sectional studies were involved. Data were collected using the BERCNA questionnaire from 393
nurses working in medical and surgical units. One hundred and fifty seven nurses working in oncology units responded to a ‘Missed
Care’ questionnaire, and data were also data collected from 540 nurses in 14 general medical and surgical wards across five public
hospitals, who responded to the question task undone (TU-13) as part of the RN4CAST-cy project. The response rate of all the studies
was >60% of the samples. Despite the the use of three different instrumentations, there were similar patterns of implicit rationing.
Findings reveal that activities described as frequently or always left undone were: mouth care (61.1%); Comfort/talk with patients
(58.3%), educating patient or families (54.0 %); emotional and psychological support (32.5%); and reviewing patient documentation
(31%). Environmental dimensions, such as ‘teamwork communication about patients’ were associated with a decreased level of
rationing. Nursing care left is a significant problem in acute care hospitals. Rationing of care creates two problems. Firstly it leaves
patients vulnerable to unmet educational, emotional, and psychological needs. Secondly, it leaves nurses vulnerable to unmet received
knowledge as they lack sufficient information about the patient situation and this may lead to false decisions in prioritising care.
Subjects