Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23925
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRadenz, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorBühl, Johannes-
dc.contributor.authorSeifert, Patric-
dc.contributor.authorBaars, Holger-
dc.contributor.authorEngelmann, Ronny-
dc.contributor.authorBarja González, Boris-
dc.contributor.authorMamouri, Rodanthi-Elisavet-
dc.contributor.authorZamorano, Felix-
dc.contributor.authorAnsmann, Albert-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T11:59:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-11T11:59:57Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-08-
dc.identifier.citationAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2021, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 17969-17994en_US
dc.identifier.issn16807324-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23925-
dc.description.abstractMulti-year ground-based remote-sensing datasets were acquired with the Leipzig Aerosol and Cloud Remote Observations System (LACROS) at three sites. A highly polluted central European site (Leipzig, Germany), a polluted and strongly dust-influenced eastern Mediterranean site (Limassol, Cyprus), and a clean marine site in the southern midlatitudes (Punta Arenas, Chile) are used to contrast ice formation in shallow stratiform liquid clouds. These unique, long-term datasets in key regions of aerosol-cloud interaction provide a deeper insight into cloud microphysics. The influence of temperature, aerosol load, boundary layer coupling, and gravity wave motion on ice formation is investigated. With respect to previous studies of regional contrasts in the properties of mixed-phase clouds, our study contributes the following new aspects: (1) sampling aerosol optical parameters as a function of temperature, the average backscatter coefficient at supercooled conditions is within a factor of 3 at all three sites. (2) Ice formation was found to be more frequent for cloud layers with cloud top temperatures above-15gC than indicated by prior lidar-only studies at all sites. A virtual lidar detection threshold of ice water content (IWC) needs to be considered in order to bring radar-lidar-based studies in agreement with lidar-only studies. (3) At similar temperatures, cloud layers which are coupled to the aerosol-laden boundary layer show more intense ice formation than decoupled clouds. (4) Liquid layers formed by gravity waves were found to bias the phase occurrence statistics below-15gC. By applying a novel gravity wave detection approach using vertical velocity observations within the liquid-dominated cloud top, wave clouds can be classified and excluded from the statistics. After considering boundary layer and gravity wave influences, Punta Arenas shows lower fractions of ice-containing clouds by 0.1 to 0.4 absolute difference at temperatures between-24 and-8gC. These differences are potentially caused by the contrast in the ice-nucleating particle (INP) reservoir between the different sites.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAtmospheric Chemistry and Physicsen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCloudsen_US
dc.subjectAerosolen_US
dc.subjectCloud condensation nucleien_US
dc.subjectIce formationen_US
dc.subjectIce crystalen_US
dc.subjectRemote sensingen_US
dc.subjectStratiform clouden_US
dc.subjectGround-based measurementen_US
dc.titleHemispheric contrasts in ice formation in stratiform mixed-phase clouds: disentangling the role of aerosol and dynamics with ground-based remote sensingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationLeibniz Institute for Tropospheric Researchen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Magallanesen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationERATOSTHENES Centre of Excellenceen_US
dc.subject.categoryEarth and Related Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.countryChileen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/acp-21-17969-2021en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121267539-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85121267539-
dc.relation.issue23en_US
dc.relation.volume21en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage17969en_US
dc.identifier.epage17994en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1680-7324-
crisitem.journal.publisherEuropean Geosciences Union-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4836-8560-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
acp-21-17969-2021.pdf5.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

243
Last Week
0
Last month
9
checked on May 13, 2024

Download(s)

94
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons