Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/2369
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHershey, Bradley L.-
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Mark W.-
dc.contributor.authorAnayiotos, Andreas-
dc.contributor.otherΑναγιωτός, Ανδρέας-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-04T10:12:07Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T05:29:37Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T11:21:26Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-04T10:12:07Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T05:29:37Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T11:21:26Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, 2003, Washington, Olympiaen_US
dc.identifier.issn10716947-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/2369-
dc.description.abstractCardiac synchronized magnetic resonance imaging of flowfields has suffered due to the relatively long acquisition times required. We developed a rapid MRI approach, BRISK PCA (Block Regional Interpolation Scheme for k-space Phase Contrast Angiography) which was simulated here using data generated by computational fluid dynamics to investigate the role of interpolation and segmentation on the accuracy and efficiency of the method. BRISK differs from other sparse sampling schemes in that the sampling rate is a function of the position in k-space and interpolation is used to generate data points not directly acquired. Combined with conventional segmentation, this allows more efficient use of time, resulting in rapid acquisitions with good spatial and temporal resolution. FAST (Fourier Acquisition in Time) is a similar sparse sampling strategy that varies the segmentation factor, rather than the sampling rate, as a function of k-space position. BRISK and FAST can be performed in nearly equally scan times. However, deviation from ideal in the FAST data was highly dependant on the starting phase of the flow waveform, while BRISK was immune to such variation. Simulations showed that BRISK (up to segmentation factor 5) and FAST 5 retained excellent axial-velocity accuracy, but the accuracy of FAST was variable and dependent on waveform characteristics.en
dc.formatpdfen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© ASMEen
dc.subjectCardiologyen
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamicsen
dc.subjectComputer simulationen
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen
dc.titleSimulation of brisk and fast phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging by computational fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.typeConference Papersen_US
dc.affiliationUniversity of Alabama at Birminghamen
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
cut.common.academicyearemptyen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f-
item.openairetypeconferenceObject-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4471-7604-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
dOI.doc23.5 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 20

479
Last Week
1
Last month
1
checked on Nov 8, 2024

Download(s) 20

197
checked on Nov 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.