Repository logoCyprus University of Technology
Log In(current)
Ελληνικά
English
  1. Home
  2. Cyprus University of Technology (Research Output)
  3. Άρθρα/Articles
  4. Brain MR image normalization in texture analysis of multiple sclerosis
  • Details

Brain MR image normalization in texture analysis of multiple sclerosis

Journal
Journal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing
Date Issued
February 2013
Author(s)
Loizou, Christos P.  
Pantziaris, Marios  
Pattichis, Constantinos S.  
Seimenis, Ioannis  
DOI
10.5430/jbgc.v3n1p20
Abstract
A problem that occurs in quantitative texture analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is that there are intra-scan and inter-scan image intensity variations due to the MRI instrumentation. Therefore, image intensity normalization methods should be applied prior to further image analysis. The objective of this work was to investigate six previously described MRI intensity normalization methods and propose the most appropriate for the pre-processing of brain T2-weighted MR images acquired from 38 symptomatic untreated multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects. The following normalization methods were investigated: Contrast Stretch Normalization (CSN), Intensity Scaling (IS), Histogram Stretching (HS), Histogram Normalization (HN), Gaussian Kernel Normalization (GKN), and Histogram Equalization (HE). The main findings of this study can be summarized as follows: 1) Lesion texture features were affected differently by the normalization process for both the 0 and 6-12 months MRI scans. For example, for the features median and contrast there was significant difference between 0 and 6-12 months for the original MRI images but not for the HN normalized ones. On the other hand for the feature complexity there was no significant difference between 0 and 6-12 months for the original MRI images, but there was for the HN normalized images. 2) The statistical lesion feature analysis between the original and the normalized images showed that the HN method gave the highest number of significant features after normalization for both the 0 and 6-12 months MRI scans. 3) The HN normalization method gave the best performance compared to the other normalization methods with respect to the distance measures, structural similarity index, coefficient of variation, and correlation coefficient between the original and the normalized 0 and 6-12 months MRI scans. Thus, based on the above findings it is recommended that the simple HN normalization method could be used prior to quantitative texture analysis in the case study presented. The findings of this study provide evidence that texture features of MRI-detectable brain white matter lesions may have an additional potential role in the clinical evaluation of MRI images in MS. This is a prerequisite step in the assessment of texture features as surrogate markers of disease progression. However, a larger scale study is needed to establish the application in clinical practice and for computing shape parameters and texture features that may provide information for better and earlier differentiation between normal tissue and MS lesions.
Subjects

Magnetic resonance im...

Multiple sclerosis

Texture analysis

Image normalization

File(s)
Thumbnail Image
Name

929-6503-1-PB.pdf

Size

531.22 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

a5ae00292bdf0ce4675e99817045a0e4

Explore by
  • Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Faculty & Departments
  • Theses
  • Patents
  • Projects
  • Journals
  • Conferences
Useful Links
  • Researcher Portfolio Guide
  • Researcher Profile
  • Create an ORCID ID
  • CUT Open Access Author Fund
  • ETDS Guide
Copyright Policies

Use Sherpa/Romeo to find publisher copyright policies

Go
Go
  • SPARC Author Addendum Engine
  • National Open Access Policy in Cyprus
Deposit your work to Ktisis
  • Self-archiving. Please sign in to Ktisis.
  • Email your work to:
    library.dspace@cut.ac.cy
  • Contact your subject librarian

Member of

OpenAIREre3dataOpenDOARCOREDART
Cyprus University of Technology
Library and
Information
Services

Copyright © 2022 - Library and Information Services Feedback - Built with DSpace-CRIS - 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
COAR NotifyCOAR Notify