Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23591
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoizou, Christos P.-
dc.contributor.authorNicolaides, Andrew N.-
dc.contributor.authorKyriacou, Efthyvoulos C.-
dc.contributor.authorGeorghiou, Niki-
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, Maura B.-
dc.contributor.authorPattichis, Constantinos S.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-09T08:40:56Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-09T08:40:56Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 2015, vol. 3, articl. no. 1900410en_US
dc.identifier.issn21682372-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23591-
dc.description.abstractThe intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery (CCA) is an established indicator of cardiovascular disease (CVD). There have been reports about the difference between the left and the right sides of the CCA IMT and their relation with CVD. In this paper, we propose an automated system based on image normalization, speckle reduction filtering, and snakes segmentation, for segmenting the CCA, perform IMT measurements, and provide the differences between the left and the right sides. The study was performed on 1104 longitudinal-section ultrasound images acquired from 568 men and 536 women out of which 125 had cardiovascular symptoms (CVD). A cardiovascular expert manually delineated the IMT for the normal and the CVD groups. The corresponding (normal versus CVD) IMT mean ± standard deviation values for the left and the right sides were 0.74 ± 0.24 versus 0.87 ± 0.24 mm and 0.70 ± 0.17 versus 0.80 ± 0.18 mm, respectively. The main findings of this paper can be summarized as follows: 1) there was no significant difference between the CCA left side IMT and the right side IMT. These findings suggest that the measurement of the CCA IMT on one side only is needed for the normal group (and this is in agreement with other studies); 2) there were statistical significant differences for the IMT measurements between the normal group and the CVD group for both the left and the right sides; 3) there was an increasing linear relationship of the left and the right IMT measurements with age for the normal group; and to a lesser extend for the CVD group; 4) no statistical significant differences were found between the manual and the automated IMT measurements for both sides; and 5) the best result for classification disease modeling, using support vector machines, to discriminate between the normal and the CVD groups was a 64%±3.5% correct classifications score when using both the left and the right IMT automated measurements. Further research is required for estimating differences and similarities between left and right intima media complex structure and morphology and their variability with texture features for differentiating between the normal and the CVD group.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicineen_US
dc.rights© IEEEen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectIMTen_US
dc.subjectB-modeen_US
dc.subjectCardiovascular diseaseen_US
dc.subjectCommon carotid arteryen_US
dc.subjectIntima media thicknessen_US
dc.subjectUltrasound imagingen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Ultrasound Intima-Media Thickness Measurements of the Left and Right Common Carotid Arteryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationIntercollegeen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Cardiovascular Disease and Educational Research Trusten_US
dc.collaborationFrederick Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cyprusen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedical Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/JTEHM.2015.2450735en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27170894-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84938718880-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84938718880-
dc.relation.volume3en_US
cut.common.academicyear2014-2015en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2168-2372-
crisitem.journal.publisherIEEE-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Informatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Informatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1247-8573-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4589-519X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

46
checked on Feb 2, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

39
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

281
Last Week
1
Last month
9
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons