Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23271
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zarkada, Anna K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Skitmore, Martin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-19T08:01:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-19T08:01:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Construction Management and Economics, 2000, vol. 18, no. 1, pp.101 - 111 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1466433X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23271 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Morality is fast becoming an integral part of the mandate for business through both societal and regulatory pressures. Collusive tendering is one of the moral choices facing decision-makers in the construction industry. This paper describes an empirical investigation of the attitudes and behavioural intent towards collusive tendering of key individuals in the tendering process. It also explores the factors that determine these attitudes. The results of the empirical investigation indicate that there is a minority of decision-makers that admit they would consider participating in some form of collusive tendering agreement under certain circumstances. These people form a distinct group in their demographic as well as decision-making profile. | en_US |
dc.format | en_US | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Construction Management and Economics | en_US |
dc.rights | © Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Tendering | en_US |
dc.subject | Moral decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | Ethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Collusion | en_US |
dc.subject | Australia | en_US |
dc.title | Decisions with moral content: Collusion | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.collaboration | Queensland University of Technology | en_US |
dc.subject.category | Economics and Business | en_US |
dc.journals | Subscription | en_US |
dc.country | Australia | en_US |
dc.subject.field | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.publication | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/014461900370997 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-0442294624 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0442294624 | - |
dc.relation.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.relation.volume | 18 | en_US |
cut.common.academicyear | 1999-2000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 101 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 111 | en_US |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | - |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
crisitem.journal.journalissn | 1466-433X | - |
crisitem.journal.publisher | Taylor & Francis | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Communication and Marketing | - |
crisitem.author.faculty | Faculty of Communication and Media Studies | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0002-9382-6412 | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Faculty of Communication and Media Studies | - |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
87
checked on Mar 14, 2024
Page view(s)
267
Last Week
1
1
Last month
2
2
checked on Feb 3, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License