Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23271
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZarkada, Anna K.-
dc.contributor.authorSkitmore, Martin-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-19T08:01:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-19T08:01:09Z-
dc.date.issued2000-
dc.identifier.citationConstruction Management and Economics, 2000, vol. 18, no. 1, pp.101 - 111en_US
dc.identifier.issn1466433X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23271-
dc.description.abstractMorality is fast becoming an integral part of the mandate for business through both societal and regulatory pressures. Collusive tendering is one of the moral choices facing decision-makers in the construction industry. This paper describes an empirical investigation of the attitudes and behavioural intent towards collusive tendering of key individuals in the tendering process. It also explores the factors that determine these attitudes. The results of the empirical investigation indicate that there is a minority of decision-makers that admit they would consider participating in some form of collusive tendering agreement under certain circumstances. These people form a distinct group in their demographic as well as decision-making profile.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofConstruction Management and Economicsen_US
dc.rights© Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectTenderingen_US
dc.subjectMoral decision makingen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectCollusionen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.titleDecisions with moral content: Collusionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationQueensland University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/014461900370997en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0442294624-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0442294624-
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume18en_US
cut.common.academicyear1999-2000en_US
dc.identifier.spage101en_US
dc.identifier.epage111en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9382-6412-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1466-433X-
crisitem.journal.publisherTaylor & Francis-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

87
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

253
Last Week
0
Last month
6
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons