Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23269
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Campbell-
dc.contributor.authorZarkada, Anna K.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-18T12:23:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-18T12:23:24Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Management Development, 2003, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 762 - 783en_US
dc.identifier.issn02621711-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23269-
dc.description.abstractContemporary management thinking is paying a great deal of attention to stakeholder theory which posits that sustainable success rests, to a great extent, with a systematic consideration of the needs and goals of all key stakeholders. This paper examines managerial effectiveness under the light of stakeholder theory. Using multivariate analysis, it investigates perceptions of importance of the dimensions of their effectiveness held by the site managers running 61 high-rise residential construction projects and 268 key project stakeholders. The views were collected through a non-results-based performance measurement tool. The findings of the research show that perceptions of the importance of each one of the performance elements vary significantly across professional groups. Opinions of high performing managers also differ form those of low-performing ones. The application of the method presented in this paper can provide a framework for improvement of both managerial performance and stakeholder relationships.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Management Developmenten_US
dc.rights© Emeralden_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectManagement effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectPerformance measurement (quality)en_US
dc.subjectStakeholdersen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the effectiveness of managers through an analysis of stakeholder perceptionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationGriffith Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/02621710310495766en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0347588161-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0347588161-
dc.relation.issue9en_US
dc.relation.volume22en_US
cut.common.academicyear2002-2003en_US
dc.identifier.spage762en_US
dc.identifier.epage783en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9382-6412-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0262-1711-
crisitem.journal.publisherEmerald-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

242
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons