Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23266
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZarkada, Anna K.-
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Campbell-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-18T11:30:50Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-18T11:30:50Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 2001, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 274-293en_US
dc.identifier.issn08858624-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23266-
dc.description.abstractInternational sales negotiations are fast becoming a major part of the marketeer's mandate in an increasingly globalised economy. To be successful in that role, managers need to be aware of the limits of acceptability of their behaviours, able to anticipate their counterparts actions and understand the motivations behind them. Presents a cross-national study of 332 experienced sales negotiators' perceptions in Australia, the USA, the UK, Japan, Russia and Greece. It explores the degree to which different tactics are considered morally acceptable in each country and how the decision-making frameworks the managers employ affect their evaluation. The results demonstrate that, although moral acceptability of specific practices, the overall level of tolerance and the effect of each one of a set of decision-making variables vary among different nationalities, the mechanism of the evaluation can be analysed by a single explanatory-model.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Business and Industrial Marketingen_US
dc.rights© Emeralden_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDecision makingen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectInternational marketingen_US
dc.subjectNational culturesen_US
dc.titleMoral decision making in international sales negotiationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationGriffith Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/EUM0000000005501en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0442328808-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0442328808-
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume16en_US
cut.common.academicyear2000-2001en_US
dc.identifier.spage274en_US
dc.identifier.epage293en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9382-6412-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0885-8624-
crisitem.journal.publisherEmerald-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

253
Last Week
0
Last month
7
checked on Aug 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons