1. Ktisis Cyprus University of Technology
  2. Cyprus University of Technology (Research Output)
  3. Άρθρα/Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23264
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZarkada, Anna K.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-18T09:22:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-18T09:22:26Z-
dc.date.issued2000-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Business Ethics, 2000, vol. 23, pp. 269–282en_US
dc.identifier.issn15730697-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23264-
dc.description.abstractThe morality of tendering practices is an issue of economic and social significance, especially when large government contracts are involved. Criticisms are mostly concentrated around collusive tendering: illegal agreements between tenderers that result in seemingly competitive bids, price fixing or market distribution schemes that circumvent the spirit of free competition and defraud clients. Although collusion has been identified as an endemic malaise of tendering, its behavioural and moral dimensions have not been systematically studied before. The paper addresses this knowledge gap and describes part of an exploratory empirical investigation of the decision-making patterns utilised by estimators in Australia's largest construction organisations.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Business Ethicsen_US
dc.rights© Springer Natureen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectCollusive tenderingen_US
dc.subjectConstruction industryen_US
dc.subjectDecision makingen_US
dc.subjectMarketing ethicsen_US
dc.titleA classification of factors influencing participating in collusive tendering agreementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationQueensland University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/A:1006210308373en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0034134796-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0034134796-
dc.relation.volume23en_US
cut.common.academicyear1999-2000en_US
dc.identifier.spage269en_US
dc.identifier.epage282en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1573-0697-
crisitem.journal.publisherSpringer Nature-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9382-6412-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

37
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

29
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

211
Last Week
2
Last month
11
checked on May 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons