1. Ktisis Cyprus University of Technology
  2. Cyprus University of Technology (Research Output)
  3. Άρθρα/Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23213
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZarkada, Anna K.-
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Campbell-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-11T07:53:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-11T07:53:48Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2002, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 282 - 299en_US
dc.identifier.issn09590552-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23213-
dc.description.abstractAttitudes of Australian and Greek-Australian consumers towards hypothetical foreign-owned and domestic-owned supermarkets in Australia were studied. Although attitudes towards the domestic-owned supermarket were found to be identical between the Australians and the Greek-Australians, the latter were significantly more supportive of the foreign supermarket. Consumer ethnocentrism was found to be correlated with a negative attitude towards a foreign-owned supermarket. Finally, the more the migrants identified with their cultural origin, the more support they showed towards the foreign supermarket. The findings of this paper provide an insight to the complex nature of the relationship between ethnic identity and consumer behaviour.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Retail and Distribution Managementen_US
dc.rights© MCB UP Limiteden_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEthnic groupsen_US
dc.subjectMarketingen_US
dc.subjectNational culturesen_US
dc.subjectSupermarketsen_US
dc.titleStore patronage prediction for foreign-owned supermarketsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationGriffith Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/09590550210429504en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84986077135-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84986077135-
dc.relation.issue6en_US
dc.relation.volume30en_US
cut.common.academicyear2001-2002en_US
dc.identifier.spage282en_US
dc.identifier.epage299en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0959-0552-
crisitem.journal.publisherEmerald-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9382-6412-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

61
checked on Nov 6, 2023

Page view(s)

279
Last Week
3
Last month
7
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons