Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23212
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Campbell-
dc.contributor.authorZarkada, Anna K.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-11T07:25:16Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-11T07:25:16Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2001, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 256-269en_US
dc.identifier.issn14664399-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/23212-
dc.description.abstractFollowing a review of the background literature, this paper details, from an HRM perspective, the development and implementation of a 360° task-based performance measurement system developed and validated on ninety-three Australian and Singaporean managers evaluated by 489 self, peer, superior and subordinate raters. The managers, from the construction and retail industries, were scored on a series of performance elements summated to establish an overall performance score. The application of the method resulted in a strong polarization of results with an élite group of highly performing managers being distinguished from all others. The findings of this research provide an important insight into the perceived polarity of managerial performance and its fundamental implications for human resource professionals considering the adoption of 360° measures within their organizations.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe International Journal of Human Resource Managementen_US
dc.rights© Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject360° performance measurementen_US
dc.subjectPerceptual polarizationen_US
dc.subjectSingaporeen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.titlePerceptual polarization of managerial performance from a human resource management perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationGriffith Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09585190010014638en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0347609000-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0347609000-
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume12en_US
cut.common.academicyear2000-2001en_US
dc.identifier.spage256en_US
dc.identifier.epage269en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9382-6412-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1466-4399-
crisitem.journal.publisherTaylor & Francis-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

225
Last Week
1
Last month
8
checked on May 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons