Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22961
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChrysargyris, Antonios-
dc.contributor.authorPetropoulos, Spyridon A.-
dc.contributor.authorPrvulovic, Dejan-
dc.contributor.authorTzortzakis, Nikos G.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02T11:52:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-02T11:52:22Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy, 2021, vol. 11, no. 6, articl. no. 1237en_US
dc.identifier.issn20734395-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22961-
dc.description.abstractAbiotic factors in nutrient solutions (NSs), such as salinity and high electrical conductivity (EC), may adversely alter plant growth and crop performance. However, there are medici-nal/aromatic plants which can not only withstand these adverse conditions, but which can also increase their productivity or even enhance their quality in such conditions. As fresh water sources suitable for irrigation are becoming more and more limited, the use of low-quality water sources and hydroponic growing systems have been suggested as the main alternatives. Towards that direction, this study aims to evaluate the effect of high EC levels in NSs on geranium (Pelargonium graveolens L’Hér.) and common verbena (Verbena officinallis L.) plants cultivated in a soilless (perlite) hydroponics system. Plants were irrigated with a full nutrient solution of EC 2.1 dS m−1 and pH 5.8 until they reached a uniform size. Then, three treatments were applied, namely: (a) a control treatment with an EC of 2.1 dS m−1 in the NS, (b) a high-salinity NS created by adding 75 mM of NaCl (EC under 8.5 dS m−1) and (c) a concentrated NS with an EC of 8.5 dS m−1. In pelargonium, high salinity decreased the total phenolic and total flavonoid contents; antioxidant capacity; N, K, Mg and P content; as well as chlorophyll fluorescence, compared to the control treatment. On the other hand, increased salinity levels increased the Na and Ca content and stomatal resistance. In common verbena, salinity decreased total phenolic content and chlorophyll fluorescence but increased total flavonoid content; antioxidants; leaf K, P, Na, Cu and Zn content; and stomatal resistance, compared to the control. In both species, high EC did not affect polyphenols, flavonoids or antioxidants, whereas it increased stomatal resistance and nutrient accumulation in the leaves, and decreased chlorophyll fluorescence compared to the control treatment. Damage indices, indicated by lipid peroxidation, hydrogen peroxide production and the elevation of enzymes’ antioxidant activities, were evidenced in both saline-and high-EC-treated plants. In conclusion, despite having the same EC levels in the nutrient solution, it seems that ionic stress caused by high mineral concentrations in the nutrient solution had less severe effects on the tested plants than the relevant osmotic stress caused by high salinity due to the addition of NaCl in the nutrient solution.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomyen_US
dc.rights© by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPelargonium graveolensen_US
dc.subjectVerbena officinallisen_US
dc.subjectHydroponicsen_US
dc.subjectSecondary metabolitesen_US
dc.subjectPoor quality wateren_US
dc.subjectSaline conditionsen_US
dc.titlePerformance of hydroponically cultivated geranium and common verbena under salinity and high electrical conductivity levelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Thessalyen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Novi Saden_US
dc.subject.categoryAgriculture Forestry and Fisheriesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countrySerbiaen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy11061237en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108964457-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85108964457-
dc.relation.issue6en_US
dc.relation.volume11en_US
cut.common.academicyearemptyen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2073-4395-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1067-7977-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2719-6627-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
agronomy-11-01237.pdfFulltext2.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

343
Last Week
1
Last month
5
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Download(s)

206
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons