Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22927
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPrasad, Munoo-
dc.contributor.authorTzortzakis, Nikos G.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T11:28:27Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-30T11:28:27Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-
dc.identifier.citationActa Horticulturae, 2021, vol. 1317, pp. 115 - 124en_US
dc.identifier.issn24066168-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22927-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this review is to critically asses the chemical characterization of biochar when it is used as a component in growing media and indicate the recommend parameters which could improve its use as component of growing media. In some earlier work on biochar little attempt was made to characterize the biochar and plant growth trials were done on an empirical basis. However, even recently, in growing trials biochar is chemically characterized only for pH, electrical conductivity (EC) and total macro and micronutrients. Only limited papers have presented available (extractable) nutrients. This is surprising since biochar can contain significant amounts of extractable nutrients and adjusting for this would be in our opinion important as it is unclear whether positive or negative response of plants is due to these or due to intrinsic properties of biochar such as specific surface area or nutrients. The methods used for pH and EC determination however have been numerous, from saturation paste extract, press extract, pour through method, various water extracts (1:1.5, 1:5, 1:10, 1:100, 2:1) and some on weight/volume and some on volume/volume ratio. Obviously, these methods will give different values especially regarding EC. In general, pH adjustment of peat by biochar has been suggested. However, it misses the point that peat, woodfibre and coir not only need pH adjustment but also require adequate levels of Ca and Mg, the uptake which can be exacerbated by high levels of K present in most biochars. Regarding available nutrients again there is a plethora of tests used, mostly water extraction often done on the same extract as for pH and EC. However, it has been shown that the CAT extractable method is closely related to plant uptake of N and P in peat/biochar media probably because it takes into account the strong buffering ability of biochar. In any case it is important to know precisely the available nutrient content in biochar for nutrient management as biochar can be a significant source of nutrients (often depending on feedstock and processing conditions). Only few papers have considered this response. It has been also shown recently that different fractions of biochar can contain different levels of macronutrients, and this has hardly been taken into account. We will show that biochar addition at low rates can reduce the EC in fertilized peat composted greenwaste (CGW) and spent mushroom compost. The reduction in EC was related to the specific surface area of the biochar. Very preliminary results also showed that addition of biochar can improve the seedling vitality index in “phytotoxic” composted green waste.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Horticulturaeen_US
dc.rights© International Society for Horticultural Scienceen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCAT extracten_US
dc.subjectElectrical conductivityen_US
dc.subjectExtraction ratioen_US
dc.subjectPHen_US
dc.subjectPhytotoxicityen_US
dc.subjectSurface areaen_US
dc.subjectTotal macronutrientsen_US
dc.titleCritical review of chemical properties of biochar as a component of growing mediaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCompost/AD Research & Advisoryen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryChemical Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryIrelanden_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1317.14en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85112809413-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85112809413-
dc.relation.volume1317en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage115en_US
dc.identifier.epage124en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2719-6627-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

3
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

275
Last Week
1
Last month
1
checked on Jan 2, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons