Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22911
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKyprianidou, Irena-
dc.contributor.authorWorrell, Ernst-
dc.contributor.authorCharalambides, Alexandros G.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T05:18:35Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-30T05:18:35Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-20-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cleaner Production, 2021, vol. 316, articl. no.128094en_US
dc.identifier.issn09596526-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22911-
dc.description.abstractThe International Maritime Organisation has set a goal to achieve a 50% reduction of the total annual greenhouse gas emissions related to the international shipping by 2050 compared to the 2008 baseline emissions. Thus, companies are looking for solutions and measures to align with the Organisation's goal. Marginal Abatement Cost Curves have been extensively used in the literature to rank several Greenhouse Gas mitigation measures based on their costs of reducing an additional unit of pollution. In this paper an expert-based, bottom-up approach was employed to construct Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for a globally operating ship-management company. Several mitigation measures were examined for the following vessel categories (a) Containerships 8000+ TEU, (b) Containerships 2000–2999 TEU, (c) Bulkers 35000–59999 DWT, and (d) Gas Tankers <49999 CBM. Furthermore, the fuel price fluctuation and carbon taxation were used to investigate the sensitivity of baseline Marginal Abatement Cost Curves. The measures, which remain cost-effective under all sensitivity analyses, undergo a Pareto Analysis and a Marginal Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. The results suggest that most of the recommended mitigation measures are of an operational and technical nature, with exception the burning of Liquified Natural Gas and the installation of Flettner Rotors for the Gas Tankers. The company could save up to 17% CO2 emissions and approximately 2 million dollars per year compared to the 2019 baseline by employing all recommended mitigation measures to all vessel categories. In addition, Carbon Storage and Capture could become a cost-effective solution with appropriate carbon taxation, but it is not the ultimate solution since it does not lead to independence from fossil fuels. The study also reveals that depending on the operating condition, even within the same vessel category, different mitigation measures should be employed.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cleaner Productionen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND licenseen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectDecarbonisationen_US
dc.subjectShippingen_US
dc.subjectMarginal abatement cost curvesen_US
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_US
dc.titleThe cost-effectiveness of CO2 mitigation measures for the decarbonisation of shipping. The case study of a globally operating ship-management companyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationUtrecht Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryEarth and Related Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryNetherlandsen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128094en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85110268588-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85110268588-
dc.relation.volume316en_US
cut.common.academicyear2021-2022en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0959-6526-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Chemical Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0374-2128-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1-s2.0-S095965262102312X-main.pdfFulltext6.76 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Last Week
1
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

261
Last Week
3
Last month
14
checked on May 10, 2024

Download(s) 10

226
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons