Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22398
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCharalambous, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorKambanaros, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorAnnoni, Jean-Marie-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-10T07:08:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-10T07:08:26Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-29-
dc.identifier.citationBrain Sciences, 2020, vol. 10, no. 10, articl. no. 688en_US
dc.identifier.issn20763425-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22398-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires are used to describe the impact of aphasia on stroke survivors’ life. People with aphasia (PWA) are traditionally excluded from research, potentially leading to a mismatch between the factors chosen in the tools and the realistic needs of PWA. The purpose of this review was to determine the direct involvement of PWA in the creation of QoL and aphasia impact-related questionnaires (AIR-Qs). Methods: A scoping review methodology was conducted by an expert librarian and two independent reviewers on health sciences based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol, through a literature search in five databases: Medline Complete, PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Search terms included ‘stroke’, ‘people with aphasia’, ‘communication’, ‘well-being’, and ‘quality of life’. Results: Of 952 results, 20 studies met the eligibility criteria. Of these, only four AIR-Qs studies (20%) were found reporting the direct involvement of PWA, while no QoL tools did so. Evidence showed involvement in the creation phase of AIR-Q, mainly in a consultation role. Conclusions: There is an absence of a framework for conducting and reporting the involvement of PWA in qualitative participatory research studies, which limits effectiveness to promote equitable best practice in aphasia rehabilitation.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBrain Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPeople with aphasia (PWA)en_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectPatient and public involvement (PPI)en_US
dc.subjectInclusionen_US
dc.subjectCommunication impairmenten_US
dc.titleAre People with Aphasia (PWA) Involved in the Creation of Quality of Life and Aphasia Impact-Related Questionnaires? A Scoping Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Fribourgen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of South Australiaen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countrySwitzerlanden_US
dc.countryAustraliaen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/brainsci10100688en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33003493-
dc.relation.issue10en_US
dc.relation.volume10en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2076-3425-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5310-3017-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5857-9460-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
brainsci-10-00688-v2 .pdf779.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

294
Last Week
0
Last month
5
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Download(s)

156
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons