Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22303
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaranikola, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorAlexandrou, George-
dc.contributor.authorMpouzika, Meropi-
dc.contributor.authorChatzittofis, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorKusi-Appiah, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorPapathanassoglou, Elizabeth-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T08:34:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-08T08:34:13Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.citationNursing in Critical Care, 2021, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 109 - 117en_US
dc.identifier.issn14785153-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22303-
dc.description.abstractBackground Approximately, 20% of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors develop post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Although Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) provides a comprehensive approach to PSTD symptoms, there is no evidence on DTS‐I‐M use in ICU survivors. Aims and objectives To validate the modified intensity Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS‐I‐M) (wherein the frequency and severity subscales are combined to express symptoms intensity) in a convenience sample of ICU survivors in Cyprus, and to explore the prevalence of PTSD symptoms and related predictors. Design An instrument validation design, along with a cross‐sectional, correlational study design was employed. Methods Translation and cultural adaptation of the instrument were achieved through a group of experts and pilot testing. The DTS‐I‐M was administered via telephone. Participants' clinical data (length of ICU stay [LOS], mechanical ventilation duration [MVD], admission diagnosis, medication history) and demographics (age, gender) were collected. Non‐parametric comparisons, and regression analyses to identify predictors of DTS‐I‐M scores and PTSD symptoms were employed. Results The Cypriot DTS‐I‐M version demonstrated high test‐retest (Pearson's r = 0.928, P < .001) and internal consistency (Cronbach's [α] alpha = .97) reliability in a sample of 69 ICU survivors (62.7% response). About 36.2% of participants reported PTSD symptoms. Factor analysis confirmed the construct validity of the DTS‐I‐M, and a 3‐factor structure (encompassing intrusive, avoidance, hyperarousal, mood, and cognitive symptoms). In a multiple regression, MVD (B = −3.11, OR [95% CI] = 22.58 [3.07‐166.09, P = .002]) and LOS (r2 = 0.302, P = .002) were statistically significant predictors of DTS‐I‐M score. Conclusion We confirm the applicability of the DTS‐I‐M for the assessment of PTSD symptoms in ICU survivors; and offer preliminary evidence on the prevalence and predictors of post‐ICU PTSD symptoms in Cyprus. Relevance to clinical practice DTS‐I‐M is an appropriate screening tool for PTSD symptoms after ICU hospitalization. Patients with longer MVD and LOS are at higher risk for post‐ICU PTSD symptoms and seem to experience more intense relevant symptoms.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNursing in Critical Careen_US
dc.rights© Wileyen_US
dc.subjectDavidson Trauma Scaleen_US
dc.subjectIntensive care uniten_US
dc.subjectPost-intensive care syndromeen_US
dc.subjectPost-traumatic stress disorderen_US
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiesen_US
dc.titlePilot exploration of post-traumatic stress symptoms in intensive care unit survivors in Cyprusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationAthalassa Psychiatric Hospitalen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Cyprusen_US
dc.collaborationShacolas Educational Centre for Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Albertaen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryCanadaen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nicc.12574en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33169508-
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume26en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage109en_US
dc.identifier.epage117en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1478-5153-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2708-1851-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7730-940X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7439-1492-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

4
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

350
Last Week
4
Last month
6
checked on Jan 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.