Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/21564
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSagova-Mareckova, Marketa-
dc.contributor.authorBoenigk, Jens-
dc.contributor.authorBouchez, Agnès-
dc.contributor.authorCermakova, Kristina-
dc.contributor.authorChonova, Teofana-
dc.contributor.authorCordier, Tristan-
dc.contributor.authorEisendle, Ursula-
dc.contributor.authorElersek, Tina-
dc.contributor.authorFazi, Stefano-
dc.contributor.authorFleituch, Tadeusz-
dc.contributor.authorFrühe, Larissa-
dc.contributor.authorGajdošová, Magdalena-
dc.contributor.authorGraupner, Nadine-
dc.contributor.authorHaegerbaeumer, Arne-
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Ann Marie-
dc.contributor.authorKopecky, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorLeese, Florian-
dc.contributor.authorNõges, Peeter-
dc.contributor.authorOrlić, Sandi-
dc.contributor.authorPanksep, Kristel-
dc.contributor.authorPawłowski, Jan W.-
dc.contributor.authorPetrusek, Adam-
dc.contributor.authorPiggott, Jeremy J.-
dc.contributor.authorRusch, Johannes Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorSalis, Romana K.-
dc.contributor.authorSchenk, Janina-
dc.contributor.authorŠimek, Karel-
dc.contributor.authorŠťovíček, Adam-
dc.contributor.authorStrand, David Allan-
dc.contributor.authorVasquez Christodoulou, Marlen-
dc.contributor.authorVrålstad, Trude-
dc.contributor.authorZlatkovic, S.-
dc.contributor.authorZupančič, Maša-
dc.contributor.authorStoeck, Thorsten-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T16:20:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-24T16:20:24Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-01-
dc.identifier.citationWater Research, 2021, vol. 191, articl. no. 116767en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/21564-
dc.description.abstractBioindication has become an indispensable part of water quality monitoring in most countries of the world, with the presence and abundance of bioindicator taxa, mostly multicellular eukaryotes, used for biotic indices. In contrast, microbes (bacteria, archaea and protists) are seldom used as bioindicators in routine assessments, although they have been recognized for their importance in environmental processes. Recently, the use of molecular methods has revealed unexpected diversity within known functional groups and novel metabolic pathways that are particularly important in energy and nutrient cycling. In various habitats, microbial communities respond to eutrophication, metals, and natural or anthropogenic organic pollutants through changes in diversity and function. In this review, we evaluated the common trends in these changes, documenting that they have value as bioindicators and can be used not only for monitoring but also for improving our understanding of the major processes in lotic and lentic environments. Current knowledge provides a solid foundation for exploiting microbial taxa, community structures and diversity, as well as functional genes, in novel monitoring programs. These microbial community measures can also be combined into biotic indices, improving the resolution of individual bioindicators. Here, we assess particular molecular approaches complemented by advanced bioinformatic analysis, as these are the most promising with respect to detailed bioindication value. We conclude that microbial community dynamics are a missing link important for our understanding of rapid changes in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, and should be addressed in the future environmental monitoring of freshwater ecosystems.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofWater Researchen_US
dc.rights© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND licenseen_US
dc.subjectArchaeaen_US
dc.subjectBiological monitoringen_US
dc.subjectEcosystemen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental biomarkersen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental monitoringen_US
dc.subjectFresh wateren_US
dc.titleExpanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoringen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCzech University of Life Sciencesen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryNATURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCzech Republicen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.watres.2020.116767en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33418487-
dc.relation.volume191en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0043-1354-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Chemical Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9849-5616-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1-s2.0-S0043135420313002-main.pdfFulltext2.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 10

96
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

66
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

272
Last Week
3
Last month
9
checked on May 11, 2024

Download(s) 10

650
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.