Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/2144
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAndriotis, Konstantinos-
dc.contributor.otherΑνδριώτης, Κωνσταντίνος-
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-10T09:15:27Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-16T08:22:15Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T09:27:05Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-10T09:15:27Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-16T08:22:15Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T09:27:05Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationAnatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2002, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 73-85en_US
dc.identifier.issn13004220-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/2144-
dc.description.abstractDevelopment by its nature is a process of change that may be implemented in a variety of ways. As a result, tourist receiving destinations have a variety of options to follow in developing their tourism industry. These options concern mainly the process and/or funding of development, and include the following dichotomous alternatives: capital versus labour intensive; endogenous versus exogenous; small scale versus large; alternative versus mass and enclave versus spread out. It is the aim of this paper to discuss the five alternatives by undertaking a literature review to investigate the benefits and costs associated with each of them and providing guidelines for destination tourism development. From the review it is evident the possibility of categorising the five development options into two distinctive groups, namely conscious and conventional tourism. Each group presents differences to its impacts to a tourist receiving destination, the ownership/control patterns of the industry and the numbers of facilities and tourists.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Researchen_US
dc.rights©Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectConscious tourismen_US
dc.subjectConventional tourismen_US
dc.subjectDevelopment optionsen_US
dc.titleOptions in tourism development: Concious versus conventional tourismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationMiddlesex Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13032917.2002.9687016en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume13en_US
cut.common.academicyear2002-2003en_US
dc.identifier.spage73en_US
dc.identifier.epage85en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2156-6909-
crisitem.journal.publisherTaylor & Francis-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Management, Entrepreneurship and Digital Business-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Management and Economics-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Options in Tourism Development..pdf71.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 20

474
Last Week
5
Last month
16
checked on May 9, 2024

Download(s)

576
checked on May 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons