Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/2075
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrambia-Kapardis, Maria-
dc.date.accessioned2009-06-03T07:10:48Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-16T08:21:55Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T09:27:36Z-
dc.date.available2009-06-03T07:10:48Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-16T08:21:55Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T09:27:36Z-
dc.date.issued2002-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 2002, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 266-278en_US
dc.identifier.issn13581988-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/2075-
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses a fundamental issue in financial regulation - that of the auditor’s ability to detect material irregularities. If an auditor is to detect irregularities he/she must also be cognisant of fraud aetiology by drawing on such other disciplines as psychology, criminology and sociology. The paper first provides a critique of existing fraud aetiology models and then describes the ROP Fraud Risk-Assessment Model constructed by the author in a study of convicted serious fraud offenders in Australia. The main concern of the paper is with the eclectic fraud detection model (EFD), of which the ROP model is a component. The EFD model is aimed at enhancing the auditor’s fraud detection ability, it has been constructed by the author and its utility successfully tested in Australia in a survey of auditors. Finally, the policy implications for auditors of the findings obtained are also considered.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Financial Regulation and Complianceen_US
dc.rights© Emeralden_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectAuditorsen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectEFD modelen_US
dc.subjectFraud detectionen_US
dc.subjectAuditorsen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectEFD modelen_US
dc.subjectFraud detectionen_US
dc.titleA fraud detection model: A must for auditorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationIntercollegeen_US
dc.subject.categorySOCIAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.journalsHybrid Open Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/13581980210810256en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.dept.handle123456789/54-
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume10en_US
cut.common.academicyear2002-2003en_US
dc.identifier.spage266en_US
dc.identifier.epage278en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1358-1988-
crisitem.journal.publisherEmerald-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Management, Entrepreneurship and Digital Business-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7762-1118-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Nov 9, 2023

Page view(s)

485
Last Week
2
Last month
11
checked on May 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons