Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19439
Title: | An integrative review on facilitators and barriers in delivering and managing injectable therapies in chronic conditions: A part of the ACNAP project ‘injectable medicines among patients with cardiovascular conditions’ | Authors: | Lambrinou, Ekaterini Kyriakou, Martha Lakatamitou, Ioanna Angus, Neil J. Khatib, Rani Vellone, Ercole Barrowcliff, Abigail Hansen, Tina Birgitte Lee, Geraldine A. |
Major Field of Science: | Medical and Health Sciences | Field Category: | Clinical Medicine | Keywords: | Adherence;Barriers;Chronic diseases;Facilitators;Injectable therapies;Perceptions;Self-injectable therapies | Issue Date: | 1-Dec-2020 | Source: | European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2020, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 663–680 | Volume: | 19 | Issue: | 8 | Start page: | 663 | End page: | 680 | Journal: | European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing | Abstract: | Introduction: Although preventive health and therapeutics have benefited from advances in drug development and device innovation, translating these evidence-based treatments into real-world practice remains challenging. Aim: The current integrative review aims to identify facilitators and barriers and perceptions in delivering and managing injectable therapies from patient perspectives. Methods: An integrative review was conducted in the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane. Keywords were used “Injectable therapy”, “IV therapy”, “SC therapy”, “long term injectable therapies”, “self-administered injectable therapy”, “patients”, “caregivers”, “family”, “carers”, “facilitators”, “barriers”, “perspectives”, “needs”, “expectations”, “chronic disease”, “cardiovascular disease” linked with the words “OR” and “AND”. The search was limited from January 2000 to July 2019. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. Results: Twenty studies were identified from the literature search. Studies followed qualitative, quantitative methodology and mixed methods. Facilitators included: health improvement, prevention of disease complications, taking control of their disease, effectiveness of the medication and convenience in management. Barriers included: fear of needles, insulin will cause harm, poor perception of the benefits of injectable therapies on their quality of life, inconvenience in self-management, social stigma, impact on daily living, financial barriers, lack of education. Perceptions included: ‘treatment of last resort’, ‘life becomes less flexible’, ‘injectables were punishment/restriction’, ‘personal failure of self-management’. Conclusion: Evidence shows how to create effective communication and shared decision-making relationships to provide best possible care to patients who need injectable therapy and support for self-management. Future research might help guide response to the fears and barriers of the patients using patients’ perspectives. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19439 | ISSN: | 18731953 | DOI: | 10.1177/1474515120939007 | Rights: | © Sage | Type: | Article | Affiliation : | Cyprus University of Technology Nicosia General Hospital American Heart Institute University of the Highlands and Islands Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust University of Leeds University of Rome Tor Vergata Zealand University Hospital University of Southern Denmark King's College London |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
13
checked on Nov 6, 2023
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
13
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s)
340
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License