Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19395
Title: Performance comparison of different inpainting algorithms for accurate DTM generation
Authors: Ayhan, Bulent 
Kwan, Chiman 
Larkin, Jude 
Kwan, Liyun 
Skarlatos, Dimitrios 
Vlachos, Marinos 
Major Field of Science: Natural Sciences
Field Category: Computer and Information Sciences
Keywords: Deep Learning;DSM;DTM;Image inpainting;Vegetation extraction
Issue Date: 21-Apr-2020
Source: Geospatial Informatics X, 27 April - 8 May 2020, United States
Conference: Geospatial Informatics 
Abstract: To accurately extract digital terrain model (DTM), it is necessary to remove heights due to vegetation such as trees and shrubs and other manmade structures such as buildings, bridges, etc. from the digital surface model (DSM). The resulting DTM can then be used for construction planning, land surveying, etc. Normally, the process of extracting DTM involves two steps. First, accurate land cover classification is required. Second, an image inpainting process is needed to fill in the missing pixels due to trees, buildings, bridges, etc. In this paper, we focus on the second step of using image inpainting algorithms for terrain reconstruction. In particular, we evaluate seven conventional and deep learning based inpainting algorithms in the literature using two datasets. Both objective and subjective comparisons were carried out. It was observed that some algorithms yielded slightly better performance than others.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19395
ISBN: 978-151063573-9
DOI: 10.1117/12.2557824
Rights: © SPIE.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Type: Conference Papers
Affiliation : Applied Research LLC 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 6, 2023

Page view(s)

291
Last Week
4
Last month
2
checked on Dec 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons