Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19391
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKyriakou, Martha-
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Nicos-
dc.contributor.authorKtisti, Sofia-
dc.contributor.authorPhilippou, Katerina-
dc.contributor.authorLambrinou, Ekaterini-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T07:09:57Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-13T07:09:57Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.citationHeart, Lung and Circulation, 2020, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1633-1647en_US
dc.identifier.issn14439506-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19391-
dc.description.abstractSupportive care (physical, psychosocial, and spiritual) may be beneficial as a coping resource in the care of patients with heart failure (HF). Nurses may provide individualised supportive care to offer positive emotional support, enhance the patients' knowledge of self-management, and meet the physical and psychosocial needs of patients with HF. The aim of this study was to examine the potential effectiveness of supportive care interventions in improving the health- related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with HF. Related outcomes of depression and anxiety were also examined. A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was performed to locate randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that implemented any supportive care interventions in patients with HF published in the English language. Identified articles were further screened for additional studies. Ten (10) RCTs were selected for the meta-analysis. Effect sizes were estimated between the comparison groups over the overall follow-up period, and presented along with confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical heterogeneity for each comparison was estimated using Q (chi square test) and I2 statistics with 95% CIs. Statistical heterogeneity was observed in all study variables (i.e., HRQoL and dimensions). There was a positive, but not statistically significant, effect of social support on HRQoL (mean difference [MD], 5.31; 95% CI, −8.93 to 19.55 [p=0.46]). The results of the two dimensions suggested a positive and statistically significant effect of the supportive care interventions (physical: MD, 7.90; 95% CI, 11.31–4.50 [p=0.00]; emotional dimension: MD, 4.10; 95% CI, 6.14–2.06; [p=0.00]). The findings of the current study highlight the need to incorporate supportive care to meet the needs of patients with HF. Patients with HF have care needs that change continuously and rapidly, and there is a need of a continuous process in order to address the holistic needs of patients with HF at all times and not just in a cardiology department or an acute care setting. Patients with HF have multiple needs, which remain unmet. Supportive care is a holistic, ongoing approach that may be effective in identifying and meeting the care needs of patients with HF along with the patient. This review includes all interventions provided in individuals with HF, giving clinicians the opportunity to choose the most suitable ones in improving the clinical outcomes of their patients with HF.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHeart, Lung and Circulationen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCardiovascular nursingen_US
dc.subjectHeart failureen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectSupportive careen_US
dc.titleSupportive Care Interventions to Promote Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Living With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationNicosia General Hospitalen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hlc.2020.04.019en_US
dc.relation.issue11en_US
dc.relation.volume29en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage1633en_US
dc.identifier.epage1647en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1443-9506-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6358-8591-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2601-8861-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

15
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

352
Last Week
2
Last month
7
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons