Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19269
Title: Ultrasound diaphragmatic manual and semi-automated motion measurements: Application in simulated and in vivo data of critically ill subjects
Authors: Loizou,  Christos P. 
Chrysostomou, Constantinos 
Minas, Giorgos 
Pattichis, Constantinos S. 
Major Field of Science: Natural Sciences
Field Category: Computer and Information Sciences
Keywords: Diaphragmatic motion analysis;Diaphragmatic muscle;Diaphragmatic ultrasound video
Issue Date: Oct-2020
Source: Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2020, vol. 194, articl. no. 105517
Volume: 194
Journal: Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 
Abstract: Background and Objective: Ultrasound diaphragmatic muscle motion characteristics may provide useful information about normal or abnormal diaphragmatic function and indicate diaphragmatic weakness, or paralysis. In the present work we propose and evaluate an integrated semi-automated analysis system for the quantitative analysis of ultrasonic motion from ultrasound diaphragmatic videos. Methods: The proposed system was evaluated in simulated videos and in 13 patients, four of whom patients were mechanically ventilated. The major steps of the methodology were as follows: video normalization, despeckle filtering, generation of an M-Mode image, snakes segmentation, and motion measurements. Results: The following manual (-/) vs semi-automated (/-), (median±IQR) measurements, which are routinely carried out by the experts, for assessing the severity of the disease, were computed. For the simulated videos the diaphragmatic excursion was 1.80±0.00 cm / 1.76±0.03 cm. For all the real ultrasound videos investigated in this study the following measurements were computed: (i) diaphragmatic excursion: 0.84±0.15 cm / 0.83±0.14 cm, (ii) inspiration time (Tinsp): 0.71±0.18 sec / 0.70±0.15 sec, (iii) total breathing time for one cycle (Ttot): 1.71±0.37 sec / 1.67±0.37 sec, (iv) diaphragmatic curve slope: 1.29±0.36 cm/sec / 1.27±0.36 cm/sec, and (v) relaxation rate (RR): 0.82±0.17 cm/sec / 0.82±0.18 cm/sec. Conclusions: Manual and semi-automated measurements were very close with non-statistical significant differences and strong correlations between them. It is anticipated that the proposed system might be useful in the clinical practice in the assessment and follow up of patients with diaphragmatic weakness or paralysis and aid in the separation of normal and abnormal diaphragmatic motion. Further validation and additional experimentation in a larger sample of videos and different patient groups is required.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19269
ISSN: 01692607
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105517
Rights: © Elsevier
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Type: Article
Affiliation : Cyprus University of Technology 
University of Cyprus 
Nicosia General Hospital 
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

Page view(s)

278
Last Week
3
Last month
28
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons