Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19143
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gurkova, Elena | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zeleníková, Renáta | - |
dc.contributor.author | Friganovic, Adriano | - |
dc.contributor.author | Uchmanowicz, Izabella | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jarosova, Darja | - |
dc.contributor.author | Papastavrou, Evridiki | - |
dc.contributor.author | Žiaková, Katarína | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-13T07:37:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-13T07:37:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-06 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Nursing Review, 2020, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 208-217 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 14667657 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19143 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Nursing shortages, the substitution of practical nurses for registered nurses, an ageingworkforce, the decreasing number of nurse graduates and the increasing migration of young nurses areimportant factors associated with the hospital safety climate in Central European countries.Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate nurses’ perceptions of the safety climate in four selectedcentral European countries (Croatia, the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia) and to determine therelationship between safety climate and unfinished nursing care.Methods: A cross-sectional study was used. The sample consisted of 1353 European nurses from fourcountries. Instruments used were the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture and the Perceived ImplicitRationing of Nursing Care. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analyses.Results: Significant differences were found between countries in all unit/hospital/outcome dimensions.‘Perceived Patient Safety’ and ‘Reporting of Incident Data’ were associated with aspects of ‘OrganizationalLearning’ and ‘Feedback and Communication about Error’. Higher prevalence of unfinished nursing care isassociated with more negative perceptions of patient safety climate.Conclusions: Cross-cultural comparisons allow us to examine differences and similarities in safetydimensions across countries. The areas with potential for initiating strategies for improvement in all fourcountries are ‘Staffing’, ‘Non-punitive Response to Error’ and ‘Teamwork across Hospital Units’.Implications for nursing and health policy: ‘Feedback and Communicating about Error’ and‘Organizational Learning - Continuous Improvement’ were the main predictors of ‘Overall Perception ofPatient Safety’ and ‘Reporting of Incident Data’. Therefore, nurse managers should focus on how to empower nurses in these areas in order to foster a no-blame culture and effective reporting. In addition, itis important for policymakers to update nursing education standards in order to address patient safety. | en_US |
dc.format | en_US | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Nursing Review | en_US |
dc.rights | © Wiley | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Hospital care | en_US |
dc.subject | Nursing | en_US |
dc.subject | Patient´s safety | en_US |
dc.subject | Safety climate | en_US |
dc.subject | Unfinished nursing care | en_US |
dc.title | Hospital safety climate from nurses' perspective in four European countries | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.collaboration | Palacký University | en_US |
dc.collaboration | University of Ostrava | en_US |
dc.collaboration | University of Zagreb | en_US |
dc.collaboration | University of Applied Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.collaboration | Wroclaw Medical University | en_US |
dc.collaboration | Cyprus University of Technology | en_US |
dc.collaboration | Comenius University in Bratislava | en_US |
dc.subject.category | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.journals | Subscription | en_US |
dc.country | Czech Republic | en_US |
dc.country | Croatia | en_US |
dc.country | Poland | en_US |
dc.country | Cyprus | en_US |
dc.country | Slovakia | en_US |
dc.subject.field | Medical and Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.publication | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/inr.12561 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31742691 | - |
dc.relation.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.relation.volume | 67 | en_US |
cut.common.academicyear | 2019-2020 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 217 | en_US |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Nursing | - |
crisitem.author.faculty | Faculty of Health Sciences | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0001-5128-3651 | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Faculty of Health Sciences | - |
crisitem.journal.journalissn | 1466-7657 | - |
crisitem.journal.publisher | Wiley | - |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
32
checked on Mar 14, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
22
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s)
279
Last Week
1
1
Last month
8
8
checked on Aug 28, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License