Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/18921
Title: Strain influence factor charts for settlement evaluation of spread foundations based on the stress-strain method
Authors: Pantelidis, Lysandros 
Major Field of Science: Engineering and Technology
Field Category: Civil Engineering
Keywords: Strain influence factor;Immediate settlement analysis;Elastic settlements;Schmertmann’s method;Cone Penetration Test;Water table correction factor
Issue Date: 1-Jun-2020
Source: Applied Sciences, 2020, vol. 10, no. 11, articl. no. 3822
Volume: 10
Issue: 11
Journal: Applied Sciences 
Abstract: In this paper, the stress–strain method for the elastic settlement analysis of shallow foundations is revisited, o ering a great number of strain influence factor charts covering the most common cases met in civil engineering practice. The calculation of settlement based on strain influence factors has the advantage of considering soil elastic moduli values rapidly varying with depth, such as those often obtained in practice using continuous probing tests, e.g., the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and Standard Penetration Test (SPT). It also o ers the advantage of the convenient calculation of the correction factor for future water table rise into the influence depth of footing. As is known, when the water table rises into the influence zone of footing, it reduces the soil sti ness and thus additional settlement is induced. The proposed strain influence factors refer to flexible circular footings (at distances 0, R/3, 2R/3 and R from the center; R is the radius of footing), rigid circular footings, flexible rectangular footings (at the center and corner), triangular embankment loading of width B and length L (L/B = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10) and trapezoidal embankment loading of infinite length and various widths. The strain influence factor values are given for Poisson’s ratio value of soil, ranging from 0 to 0.5 with 0.1 interval. The compatibility of the so-called “characteristic point” of flexible footings with the stress–strain method is also investigated; the settlement under this point is considered to be the same as the uniform settlement of the respective rigid footing. The analysis showed that, despite the e ectiveness of the “characteristic point” concept in homogenous soils, the method in question is not suitable for non-homogenous soils, as it largely overestimates settlement at shallow depths (for z/B < 0.35) and underestimates it at greater depths (for z/B > 0.35; z is the depth below the footing and B is the footing width).
Description: The article was funded by the “CUT Open Access Author Fund”
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/18921
ISSN: 20763417
DOI: 10.3390/app10113822
Rights: © 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Type: Article
Affiliation : Cyprus University of Technology 
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
applsci-10-03822-v3.pdfFulltext12.89 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

336
Last Week
4
Last month
28
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Download(s) 10

299
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons