Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/18587
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Vlachos, Marinos | - |
dc.contributor.author | Berger, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mathelier, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Agrafiotis, Panagiotis | - |
dc.contributor.author | Skarlatos, Dimitrios | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-28T06:08:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-28T06:08:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08-19 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 2019, vol. 42, no. 2/W15, pp. 1195-1201 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 16821750 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/18587 | - |
dc.description | Presented at 27th CIPA International Symposium - Documenting the Past for a Better Future, Avila, Spain, 1-5 September, 2019 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents an investigation as to whether and how the selection of the SfM-MVS software affects the 3D reconstruction of submerged archaeological sites. Specifically, Agisoft Photoscan, VisualSFM, SURE, 3D Zephyr and Reality Capture software were used and evaluated according to their performance in 3D reconstruction using specific metrics over the reconstructed underwater scenes. It must be clarified that the scope of this study is not to evaluate specific algorithms or steps that the various software use, but to evaluate the final results and specifically the generated 3D point clouds. To address the above research issues, a dataset from the ancient shipwreck, laying at 45 meters below sea level, is used. The dataset is composed of 19 images having very small camera to object distance (1 meter), and 42 images with higher camera to object distance (3 meters) images. Using a common bundle adjustment for all 61 images, a reference point cloud resulted from the lower dataset is used to compare it with the point clouds of the higher dataset generated using the different photogrammetric packages. Following that, a comparison regarding the number of total points, cloud to cloud distances, surface roughness, surface density and a combined 3D metric was done to evaluate and see which one performed the best. | en_US |
dc.format | en_US | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives | en_US |
dc.rights | © Authors | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.subject | SfM MVS | en_US |
dc.subject | Underwater 3D Reconstruction | en_US |
dc.subject | Underwater Photogrammetry | en_US |
dc.title | Software comparison for underwater archaeological photogrammetric applications | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.collaboration | Cyprus University of Technology | en_US |
dc.collaboration | National School of Geographic Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.category | Civil Engineering | en_US |
dc.journals | Open Access | en_US |
dc.country | Cyprus | en_US |
dc.country | France | en_US |
dc.subject.field | Engineering and Technology | en_US |
dc.publication | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-1195-2019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85072172719 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85072172719 | - |
dc.relation.issue | 2/W15 | en_US |
dc.relation.volume | 42 | en_US |
cut.common.academicyear | 2020-2021 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 1195 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 1201 | en_US |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | article | - |
crisitem.journal.journalissn | 1682-1750 | - |
crisitem.journal.publisher | International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Civil Engineering and Geomatics | - |
crisitem.author.faculty | Faculty of Engineering and Technology | - |
crisitem.author.faculty | Faculty of Engineering and Technology | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0003-4474-5007 | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0002-2732-4780 | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Faculty of Engineering and Technology | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Faculty of Engineering and Technology | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Faculty of Engineering and Technology | - |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-1195-2019.pdf | Fulltext | 1.43 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
11
checked on Mar 14, 2024
Page view(s)
497
Last Week
0
0
Last month
32
32
checked on Mar 14, 2025
Download(s)
378
checked on Mar 14, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License