Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/18563
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUchmanowicz, Izabella-
dc.contributor.authorWleklik, Marta-
dc.contributor.authorHill, Loreena Michelle-
dc.contributor.authorLisiak, Magdalena-
dc.contributor.authorChudiak, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorLomper, Katarzyna-
dc.contributor.authorLambrinou, Ekaterini-
dc.contributor.authorJennings, Catriona-
dc.contributor.authorFitzsimons, Donna-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-23T13:28:46Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-23T13:28:46Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2019, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 601-610en_US
dc.identifier.issn18731953-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/18563-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The role of clinical guidelines is to provide patients with the best quality, evidence-based care. Nurses are actively involved in the development of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. A number of the guidelines include specific recommendations relating to nursing duties and, hence, nurses require necessary knowledge and skills for their implementation. Inclusion of the guidelines in the curricula for university nursing programmes could facilitate their implementation to everyday practice. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the awareness and opinions of Polish nursing students who participated in a guideline-based Master of Science education programme about the usefulness of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Methods: A prospective and cross-sectional research design was used and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed. A total of 188 nursing students (mean age 31.18±10.41 years) who met the inclusion criteria were invited to complete the BeGuideWell survey. This instrument included 16 questions: five on participants’ demographics and 11 addressing the issues associated with the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The Yates chi-squared test or Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The majority of students had become familiar with the diagnostics and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Nearly half of the students documented that they had never heard of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines before starting the Master of Science programme. Most students found the European Society of Cardiology guidelines helpful for their university education. Most respondents stated that the guidelines were useful in their everyday practice and believed that they contributed to better quality of patient care. Conclusions: Students can become more familiar with the European Society of Cardiology guidelines during the course of their post-graduate education, preparing them to implement the European Society of Cardiology guidelines in their everyday practice.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursingen_US
dc.rights© Sageen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectBeGuideWell surveyen_US
dc.subjectCardiovascular nursingen_US
dc.subjectEuropean Society of Cardiology guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-based nursing practiceen_US
dc.subjectPost-graduate educationen_US
dc.titleBeGuideWell: A prospective cross-sectional study analysing the awareness and opinions of nursing students in Poland on the usefulness of European Society of Cardiology guidelines in post-graduate education programmeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationWroclaw Medical Universityen_US
dc.collaborationQueen’s University Belfasten_US
dc.collaborationImperial College Londonen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryPolanden_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1474515119851615en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31117812-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85072628529-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85072628529-
dc.relation.issue7en_US
dc.relation.volume18en_US
cut.common.academicyear2019-2020en_US
dc.identifier.spage601en_US
dc.identifier.epage610en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1873-1953-
crisitem.journal.publisherSage-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2601-8861-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Mar 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

302
Last Week
2
Last month
9
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons