Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1685
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Mark W.-
dc.contributor.authorKortright, Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorAnayiotos, Andreas-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-04T13:52:36Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T05:22:17Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T09:56:30Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-04T13:52:36Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T05:22:17Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T09:56:30Z-
dc.date.issued2007-05-22-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2007, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1256–1262.en_US
dc.identifier.issn10531807-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1685-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To show that accuracy of jet flow representation by magnetic resonance (MR) phase-contrast (PC) velocity-encoded (VE) cine imaging is dominated by error terms resulting from the temporal distribution of data, and to present a generally applicable data interpolation-based approach to correct for this phenomenon. Materials and Methods: Phase-contrast data were acquired in a stenotic orifice flow phantom using a physiologic pulsatile flow waveform. A temporally registered scan, acquired without data segmentation or interleaving was obtained (17 minutes) and taken as the reference (REF). Conventional PC data sets were acquired using segmentation and data interleaving. An enhanced temporal registration (ETR) algorithm was applied to the acquired data to temporally interpolate component sets and output data at matching time points, thereby reducing temporal dispersion. Results: Compared to the REF data, conventionally processed PC data consistently overestimated peak velocities in laminar jet flow regions (127% ± 28%) and exhibited relatively weak correlations (r = 0.67 ± 0.23). The ETR-processed data better represented peak velocities (101% ± 13%, P < 0.001) and correlated more closely with the REF data (r = 0.94 ± 0.05. P < 0.001). Conclusion: The temporal distribution of PC data impacts the accuracy of velocity representation in pulsatile jet flow. A temporal registration postprocessing algorithm can minimize loss of accuracy.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.rights© Wileyen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectData processingen_US
dc.subjectJets--Fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectk-spacesen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.titleCorrection of temporal misregistration artifacts in jet flow by conventional phase-contrast MRIen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.affiliationUniversity of Alabama at Birminghamen
dc.collaborationUniversity of Alabama at Birminghamen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmri.20926en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue6en_US
dc.relation.volume25en_US
cut.common.academicyear2007-2008en_US
dc.identifier.spage1256en_US
dc.identifier.epage1262en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1522-2586-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4471-7604-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

514
Last Week
1
Last month
1
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons