Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/15704
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBinos, Paris-
dc.contributor.authorPapadopoulou, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorLoizou, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorHatzisevastou-Loukidou, Charikleia-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-03T11:10:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-03T11:10:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-11-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Medicine and Medical Research, 2017, vol. 19, no.9, pp. 1-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn22310614-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/15704-
dc.description.abstractThis case study examines the performance of a Greek child with Williams-Beuren syndrome and a group of ten typically developing children whose chronological age is equivalent to the mental age of the WS case. The study concerns the field of pediatrics and linguistics. The comparison among the WS case and the typically developing (TD) children is based on the elicitation Perfective Past Tense Test (PPTT) which examines the distinctions between perfective (simple past) or imperfective (past continuous) forms since the conjugation of simple past involves the existence of the aspectual marker –s as suffix. This distinction is conducted under the model of dual-mechanism account [1] that suggests the existence of marker –s, as result of a rule-based process of participants. This case study brings into effect the assumption that cannot explain the model of “different developmental trajectories” in disordered populations [2]. The present results indicate a clear preference of the WS case to sigmatic forms and an unexpected preference only for Novel non-sigmatic verbs to analogies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Medicine and Medical Researchen_US
dc.rights© Binos et al.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.subjectWilliams Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectlanguage disordersen_US
dc.subjectDual-mechanismen_US
dc.subjectpast tense formationen_US
dc.titleA Case Study with Williams-Beuren Syndromeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity College Londonen_US
dc.collaborationEuropean University Cyprusen_US
dc.collaborationOpen University UKen_US
dc.collaborationAristotle University of Thessalonikien_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldHumanitiesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31704en_US
dc.relation.issue9en_US
dc.relation.volume19en_US
cut.common.academicyear2016-2017en_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage9en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2231-0614-
crisitem.journal.publisherScience Domain International-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-3850-1866-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
document (1).pdfA Case Study with Williams-Beuren Syndrome227.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

386
Last Week
4
Last month
10
checked on May 10, 2024

Download(s) 10

319
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.