Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1561
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Jerry G.-
dc.contributor.authorFox, James F.-
dc.contributor.authorAnayiotos, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorPerry, G. J.-
dc.contributor.authorElmahdi, Abdelaziz M.-
dc.contributor.otherΑναγιωτός, Ανδρέας-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-04T12:37:40Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T05:22:50Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T10:11:44Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-04T12:37:40Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T05:22:50Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T10:11:44Z-
dc.date.issued1997-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1997, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 349-356en_US
dc.identifier.issn01480731-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1561-
dc.description.abstractInvestigations of valvular regurgitation attempt to specify flow field characteristics and apply them to the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method for quantifying regurgitant flow. Most investigators assume a hemispherical shape to these equivelocity shells proximal to an axisymmetric (circular) orifice. However, in vivo flow fields are viscous and regurgitant openings vary in shape and size. By using centerline profiles and isovelocity surfaces, this investigation describes the flow field proximal to circular and elliptical orifice. Steady, proximal flow fields are obtained with two- and three-dimensional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations. These simulations are verified by in 'vitro, laser-Doppler velocimetry (LDV) experiments. The data show that a unique normalized proximal flow field results for each orifice shape independent of orifice flow or size. The distinct differences inflow field characteristics with orifice shape may provide a mechanism for evaluating orifice characteristics and regurgitant flows. Instead of the hemispherical approximation technique, this study attempts to show the potential to define a universal flow evaluation method based on the details of the flowfield according to orifice shape. Preliminary results indicate that Magnetic Resonance (MR) and Color Doppler (CD) may reproduce these flow details and allow such a procedure in vivo. Investigations of valvular regurgitation attempt to specify flow field characteristics and apply them to the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method for quantifying regurgitant flow. Most investigators assume a hemispherical shape to these equivelocity shells proximal to an axisymmetric (circular) orifice. However, in vivo flow fields are viscous and regurgitant openings vary in shape and size. By using centerline profiles and isovelocity surfaces, this investigation describes the flow field proximal to circular and elliptical orifices. Steady, proximal flow fields are obtained with two- and three-dimensional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations. These simulations are verified by in vitro, laser-Doppler velocimetry (LDV) experiments. The data show that a unique, normalized proximal flow field results for each orifice shape independent of orifice flow or size. The distinct differences in flow field characteristics with orifice shape may provide a mechanism for evaluating orifice characteristics and regurgitant flows. Instead of the hemispherical approximation technique, this study attempts to show the potential to define a universal flow evaluation method based on the details of the flowfield according to orifice shape. Preliminary results indicate that Magnetic Resonance (MR) and Color Doppler (CD) may reproduce these flow details and allow such a procedure in vivo.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of biomechanical engineeringen_US
dc.rights© ASMEen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectComputer simulationen_US
dc.subjectLasersen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonanceen_US
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamicsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the proximal flow field to circular and noncircular orifices of different aspect ratiosen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Alabama at Birminghamen_US
dc.subject.categoryMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.2796100en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume119en_US
cut.common.academicyear1996-1997en_US
dc.identifier.spage349en_US
dc.identifier.epage356en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1528-8951-
crisitem.journal.publisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4471-7604-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

467
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.