Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14972
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPetinou, Kakia-
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Richard G.-
dc.contributor.authorMody, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorGravel, Judith S.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T09:20:58Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-23T09:20:58Z-
dc.date.issued1999-09-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Linguistics and Phonetics,1999, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 351-367en_US
dc.identifier.issn02699206-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14972-
dc.description.abstractThis prospective investigation examined the effects of otitis media with effusion (OME) on early speech production. Two groups of infants, the otitis media positive (OME+; n = 8), and the otitis media negative (OME-; n = 8) were defined according to otitis media (OM) history during the first year of life. OM documentation was based on results from tympanometry, pneumatic otoscopy, and behavioural audiometry collected bimonthly beginning at age 2 months. Phonetic transcriptions were completed from infants' recorded babbling samples at 10, 12 and 14 months of age. No differences were found between the two groups on rate of vocalizations (i.e. consonants produced per minute). Differences between the two groups were seen in place and manner of articulation. OME+ infants produced more bilabial stops than OME- infants who, in turn, produced more alveolar stops and nasals than did their OME+ counterparts. Furthermore, within the OME+ group, children with poorer hearing thresholds showed preference for bilabial stops, whereas children with better hearing thresholds showed more diversity in their phonetic inventories.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Linguistics & Phoneticsen_US
dc.rights© Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectEarly speechen_US
dc.subjectOtitis mediaen_US
dc.titleThe impact of otitis media with effusion on early phonetic inventories: A longitudinal prospective investigationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationAlbert Einstein College of Medicineen_US
dc.subject.categoryLanguages and Literatureen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Humanitiesen_US
dc.journalsHybrid Open Accessen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldHumanitiesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/026992099299022en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0032793456-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0032793456-
dc.relation.issue5en_US
dc.relation.volume13en_US
cut.common.academicyear1999-2000en_US
dc.identifier.spage351en_US
dc.identifier.epage367en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1464-5076-
crisitem.journal.publisherTaylor & Francis-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6580-5190-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s) 50

280
Last Week
1
Last month
10
checked on May 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.