Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14899
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoutinas, Michalis-
dc.contributor.authorPeeva, Ludmila G.-
dc.contributor.authorLivingston, Andrew G-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-08T08:11:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-08T08:11:55Z-
dc.date.issued2005-05-26-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2005, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 1252-1260en_US
dc.identifier.issn10974660-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14899-
dc.description.abstractThis study presents a comparison of the efficiency of a bioscrubber and a biotrickling filter (BTF) for the removal of ethyl acetate (EA) vapour from a waste gas stream, under the same operating conditions. The maximum EA elimination capacity achieved in the bioscrubber was 550 gm-3 h-1 with removal efficiency higher than 96%. For higher EA loadings the bioscrubber was oxygen limited, which caused incomplete EA biodegradation. When pure oxygen was fed to the bioscrubber at a rate of 0.02 L min-1, the bioscrubber recovered and could treat higher EA loadings without any oxygen limitation. The BTF achieved EA elimination capacity of 600 gm-3 h-1 with removal efficiency higher than 97% and the dissolved oxygen concentration remained substantially higher than in the bioscrubber. However, severe channelling and blockage of the spray nozzle occurred due to the excessive biomass growth. Overall, the bioscrubber system was easier to operate and control than the BTF, while an enhancement of the oxygen mass transfer in the bioscrubber could potentially increase its performance by up to three times.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnologyen_US
dc.rights© Society of Chemical Industry.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectBioscrubberen_US
dc.subjectBiotrickling filteren_US
dc.subjectEthyl acetateen_US
dc.subjectOxygen limitationen_US
dc.titleAn attempt to compare the performance of bioscrubbers and biotrickling filters for degradation of ethyl acetate in gas streamsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationImperial College Londonen_US
dc.subject.categoryChemical Sciencesen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jctb.1319en_US
dc.relation.issue11en_US
dc.relation.volume80en_US
cut.common.academicyear2005-2006en_US
dc.identifier.spage1252en_US
dc.identifier.epage1260en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1097-4660-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Chemical Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5371-4280-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

30
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

267
Last Week
5
Last month
12
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons