Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14808
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLitskas, Vassilis D.-
dc.contributor.authorChrysargyris, Antonios-
dc.contributor.authorStavrinides, Menelaos-
dc.contributor.authorTzortzakis, Nikos G.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-05T11:04:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-05T11:04:20Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cleaner Production, 2019, vol. 233, pp. 1334-1343en_US
dc.identifier.issn09596526-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14808-
dc.description.abstractMedicinal and Aromatic Plants (MAPs) are broadly cultivated in the Mediterranean but their environmental footprint is not very well studied. In this paper, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was applied to determine the energy balance, carbon and water footprints (CF and WF, respectively) in 50 farms, organic and conventional, where four MAP species were cultivated; spearmint (Mentha spicata), oregano (Oreganum vulgare), rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) and Damask rose (Rosa damascena). The lowest value for energy intensity (EI) was observed for organic spearmint (0.18 MJ/kg fresh weight; f.w.) while the highest for conventional Damask rose (5.80 MJ/kg f.w.). Statistically significant differences were observed in EI between organic and conventional farms for spearmint and Damask rose while no differences were found for oregano and rosemary. The lowest CF was observed for organic rosemary (0.051 kg CO2-eq/kg f.w.) while the highest for conventional Damask rose (0.463 kg CO2-eq/kg f.w.). Statistical differences in the CF between organic and conventional farms for the four species followed the same pattern as for EI. Conventional spearmint had the lowest WF (61.5 L of water/kg f.w.) and organic Damask rose the highest (1522 L of water/kg f.w.). Statistical differences between the two management systems were observed only for Damask rose. The 50 farms were grouped according to the values of three indicators (EI, CF and WF) using cluster analysis. Four clusters were identified with 68% of the farms (34) belonging to the low footprint cluster which contained organic and conventional spearmint, oregano and rosemary farms. The other three clusters contained the (16) Damask rose farms, where the inputs were higher in comparison to the other three species and the highest footprint clusters contained conventional rose farms. Our work suggests that MAPs are viable candidates for the implementation of sustainable agriculture in the Mediterranean.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cleaner Productionen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.subjectAromatic plantsen_US
dc.subjectCyprusen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental footprintsen_US
dc.subjectOrganic farmingen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleWater-energy-food nexus: A case study on medicinal and aromatic plantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryAGRICULTURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgricultural Biotechnologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Agricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.065en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85067578221-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85067578221-
dc.relation.volume233en_US
cut.common.academicyear2019-2020en_US
dc.identifier.spage1334en_US
dc.identifier.epage1343en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0959-6526-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0399-2063-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1067-7977-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6459-1941-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2719-6627-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

381
Last Week
7
Last month
1
checked on Feb 16, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.