Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14773
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGregoriades, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorSutcliffe, Alistair G.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-31T11:35:49Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-31T11:35:49Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationDecision Support Systems, 2008, vol. 45, iss. 4, pp. 1017-1030en_US
dc.identifier.issn01679236-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14773-
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes a socio-technical approach to business process redesign through the investigation of complex interactions and dependencies among humans and IT systems of organisations. The focus is on the need to assess business process performance early in the redesign process, to prevent organisational failures. The method is based on human performance quantification and is supported by a tool that enables scenario-based evaluation of prospective organisational processes through simulation. The approach combines probabilistic and subjective measures of tasks and communication acts in business processes to quantify business performance in terms of cycle time. The approach models business processes as a set of scenarios of sequential activities where the dependencies between actors, IT systems and tasks are explicitly defined. Business process performance assessment is achieved through a systematic walkthrough of the process model using these scenarios. Human performance constitutes an important parameter to business process performance and is modelled based on Human Performance Shaping Factors (PSF) and assessed using Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN). Process cycle time is calculated using aggregates of task and communication completion times, and calibrated using performance estimates of each of the agents in the scenario. The method enables trade-off analysis among candidate process models and identification of performance bottlenecks early in the design phase. A radiology process improvement case study is presented that demonstrates the use of the method and the tool.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDecision Support Systemsen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectBayesian Belief Networksen_US
dc.subjectBusiness process simulationen_US
dc.subjectHuman performanceen_US
dc.titleA socio-technical approach to business process simulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Surreyen_US
dc.collaborationThe University of Manchesteren_US
dc.subject.categoryComputer and Information Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dss.2008.04.003en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-53349128871-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/53349128871-
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume45en_US
cut.common.academicyear2008-2009en_US
dc.identifier.spage1017en_US
dc.identifier.epage1030en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7422-1514-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0167-9236-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

43
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

32
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

325
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Jan 29, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.