Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14769
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSutcliffe, Alistair G.-
dc.contributor.authorGregoriades, Andreas-
dc.contributor.otherΓρηγοριάδης, Αντρέας-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-31T10:16:41Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-31T10:16:41Z-
dc.date.issued2007-02-20-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans, 2007, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 249-261.en_US
dc.identifier.issn10834427-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14769-
dc.description.abstractThe system reliability analyzer tool for analyzing the reliability of system designs is described and its use illustrated in a system engineering case study of a naval command and control system. The performance of systems consisting of human operators and technology components is assessed by Bayesian nets, which calculate error probabilities from inputs of agent properties and environmental conditions. The tool tests scenarios representing the system design and its operational behavior, which is modeled as cycles of command and control tasks. The tool indicates weak points in the scenario sequence and assesses the reliability of one or more system designs with a set of operational scenarios and a variety of environmental conditions.en_US
dc.formatPdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humansen_US
dc.rights© IEEE.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectHuman factorsen_US
dc.subjectSystem reliabilityen_US
dc.subjectSystem requirements and specificationsen_US
dc.titleAutomating scenario analysis of human and system reliabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationThe University of Manchesteren_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Surreyen_US
dc.subject.categoryComputer and Information Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TSMCA.2006.886375en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33947586977-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/33947586977-
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume37en_US
cut.common.academicyear2006-2007en_US
dc.identifier.spage249en_US
dc.identifier.epage261en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7422-1514-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1558-2426-
crisitem.journal.publisherIEEE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

34
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

29
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

307
Last Week
1
Last month
4
checked on Feb 2, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons