Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14675
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFuertes, Ana Maria-
dc.contributor.authorKalotychou, Elena-
dc.contributor.otherΚαλοτύχου, Έλενα-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T07:34:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-23T07:34:33Z-
dc.date.issued2007-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Forecasting, 2007, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 85-100en_US
dc.identifier.issn01692070-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14675-
dc.description.abstractThis paper tackles the design of an optimal early warning system (EWS) for sovereign default from two distinct angles: the choice of the econometric methodology and the evaluation of the EWS itself. It compares K-means clustering of macrodata, a logit regression for macrodata, a logit regression for credit ratings, and the combined forecasts from all three methods. The optimal choice of forecast method is shown to depend on the desired trade-off between missed defaults and false alarms. Hence, it is crucial to account for the decision-maker's preferences which are characterized through a loss function and risk-aversion parameter. Recursive forecast combining generally yields a better balance of type I and type II errors than any of the individual forecasting methods, and outperforms the naïve predictions.en_US
dc.formatPdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Forecastingen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectClusteringen_US
dc.subjectLoss functionen_US
dc.subjectLogit forecasten_US
dc.subjectForecast combiningen_US
dc.subjectEmerging marketsen_US
dc.subjectDefault predictionen_US
dc.subjectCountry risk analysisen_US
dc.titleOptimal design of early warning systems for sovereign debt crisesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCity University Londonen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.07.001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33847039550-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/33847039550-
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume23en_US
cut.common.academicyear2006-2007en_US
dc.identifier.spage85en_US
dc.identifier.epage100en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Finance, Accounting and Management Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2824-0383-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Management and Economics-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0169-2070-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

47
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

42
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

343
Last Week
0
Last month
6
checked on Aug 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons