Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14671
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKalotychou, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorStaikouras, Panagiotis-
dc.contributor.otherΚαλοτύχου, Ελένη-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-22T11:52:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-22T11:52:48Z-
dc.date.issued2005-12-19-
dc.identifier.citationFinancial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 2005, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 187-214en_US
dc.identifier.issn09638008-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14671-
dc.description.abstractThe present study unveils the importance of regional characteristics of sovereign debt crises in Latin America and South East Asia. It proposes and empirically corroborates a refinement of the logit approach, for assessing sovereign risk, which draws upon a region-specific parameterization - composite estimator. The analysis identifies some common features of debt crises that largely reflect domestic solvency, liquidity factors and, to a lesser extent, trade-balance variables and external shocks. Nonetheless, heterogeneity effects and regional signals point towards the use of region-specific models. Such approach depicts specific risk factors such as openness and debt burden for Latin America and reserves, output and government expenditure for Asia, thereby suggesting distinctive aspects to debt crises. Out-of-sample forecast comparisons further support the use of the composite estimator. The latter outperforms the simple pooled and random effects approach on the basis of various criteria, albeit slightly biased towards false non-crises predictions. © 2005 New York University Salomon Center.en_US
dc.formatPdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFinancial Markets, Institutions and Instrumentsen_US
dc.rights© Wiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.subjectInternational credit exposureen_US
dc.subjectPanel logiten_US
dc.subjectRegion-specific estimatorsen_US
dc.subjectSovereign debt crisesen_US
dc.titleThe banking exposure to international lending: Regional differences or common fundamentals?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCity University Londonen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.0963-8008.2005.00103.xen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-27644548294-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/27644548294-
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume14en_US
cut.common.academicyear2005-2006en_US
dc.identifier.spage187en_US
dc.identifier.epage214en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Finance, Accounting and Management Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Tourism Management, Hospitality and Entrepreneurship-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2824-0383-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Management and Economics-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

329
Last Week
0
Last month
4
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.