Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14495
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStylianou, Stelios-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-11T09:22:14Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-11T09:22:14Z-
dc.date.issued2008-07-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2008, vol. 11, iss. 3, pp. 239-256en_US
dc.identifier.issn14645300-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14495-
dc.description.abstractThis study presents a technique for enhancing causal validity in in-depth interview research. The technique is based on the logic of control, as applied in various research contexts such as experiments and statistical analyses. According to this logic, to detect the real effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable, all other variables must be held constant. By using interview control questions (ICQs), this study applies this principle in in-depth interviewing. An ICQ is a probe question that controls an independent variable in the participant's thinking. Two modes are presented: simple control (neutralizing an independent variable to examine whether it is a necessary condition for an outcome) and parallel control (isolating an independent variable to examine whether it is a sufficient condition for an outcome). In both modes, the method allows for additional independent variables to surface. Applications in in-depth interviews exploring attitudes toward victimless deviance are presented. © 2008 Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Social Research Methodologyen_US
dc.rights© Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectOffenseen_US
dc.subjectPenaltyen_US
dc.subjectPunitive attitudesen_US
dc.titleInterview control questionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationIntercollegeen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedia and Communicationsen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13645570701401289en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-45949102636-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/45949102636-
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume11en_US
cut.common.academicyear2008-2009en_US
dc.identifier.spage239en_US
dc.identifier.epage256en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1464-5300-
crisitem.journal.publisherTaylor & Francis-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Internet Studies-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4640-6391-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

246
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Jul 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.