Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14456
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKyrousi, Antigone G.-
dc.contributor.authorPanigyrakis, George G.-
dc.contributor.authorPanopoulos, Anastasios P.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T08:40:09Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-10T08:40:09Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Advertising,2016, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 771-798en_US
dc.identifier.issn17593948-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14456-
dc.description.abstractThe portrayal of women in advertising is a prolific research topic and extant studies have emphasized the negative attitudes of female consumers toward stereotypic depictions of women in advertising in general. However, empirical evidence regarding female consumers’ responses to specific ads depicting women in decorative roles is scarce and conflicting. Drawing on the principles of evolutionary psychology, the present paper proposes that women’s attitudes toward such ads are underlied by the evolved context-sensitive mechanism of intrasexual competition. Relevant hypotheses are tested through two experimental studies. The findings indicate that decorative portrayals in advertising elicit more favorable attitudes when female consumers compete through a self-promotion strategy with regard to a competitor derogation one. Additionally, the temporal orientation of self-referencing during ad processing emerges as a moderator of the influence of the motivational state elicited by the medium context on attitudes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Advertisingen_US
dc.rights© Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectAdvertisingen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionary psychologyen_US
dc.subjectFemale stereotypesen_US
dc.subjectIntrasexual competitionen_US
dc.titleAttitudes toward ads portraying women in decorative roles and female competition: An evolutionary psychology perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationAthens University of Economics and Businessen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Macedoniaen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedia and Communicationsen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02650487.2016.1138576en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84979010082-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84979010082-
dc.relation.issue5en_US
dc.relation.volume35en_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
dc.identifier.spage771en_US
dc.identifier.epage798en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2099-5944-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 9, 2023

Page view(s)

283
Last Week
3
Last month
7
checked on Jul 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.