Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14108
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVlachos, Marinos-
dc.contributor.authorBodin, P.-
dc.contributor.authorSkarlatos, Dimitrios-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T09:12:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-26T09:12:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-31-
dc.identifier.citation8th International Workshop on 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures, 3D-ARCH 2019, Bergamo, Italy, 6 February 2019 through 8 February 2019en_US
dc.identifier.issn21949042-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14108-
dc.descriptionISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Volume 42, Issue 2/W9, 31 January 2019, Pages 755-761en_US
dc.description.abstract© Authors 2019. The main idea of this particular study was to validate if the new FOVEON technology implemented by sigma cameras can provide better overall results and outperform the traditional Bayer pattern sensor cameras regarding the radiometric information that records as well as the photogrammetric point cloud quality that can provide. Based on that, the scope of this paper is separated into two evaluations. First task is to evaluate the quality of information reconstructed during de-mosaicking step for Bayer pattern cameras by detecting potential additional colour distortion added during the de-mosaicking step, and second task is the geometric comparisons of point clouds generated by the photos by Bayer and FOVEON sensors against a reference point cloud. The first phase of the study is done using various de-mosaicking algorithms to process various artificial Bayern pattern images and then compare them with reference FOVEON images. The second phase of the study is carried on by reconstructing 3D point clouds of the same objects captured by a Bayer and a FOVEON sensor respectively and then comparing the various point clouds with a reference one, generated by a structured light hand-held scanner. The comparison is separated into two parts, where initially we evaluate five separate point clouds (RGB, Gray, Red, Green, Blue) for each camera sensor per site and then a second comparison is evaluated on colour classified RGB point cloud segments.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectBayer patternen_US
dc.subjectDe-mosaickingen_US
dc.subjectPhotogrammetryen_US
dc.subjectPoint clouden_US
dc.subjectStructure light scanneren_US
dc.titleFOVEON VS BAYER: COMPARISON of 3D RECONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCESen_US
dc.typeConference Papersen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationNational School of Geographic Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryFranceen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Workshop on 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architecturesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-755-2019en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065451602en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85065451602en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#en
dc.relation.issue2/W9en
dc.relation.volume42en
cut.common.academicyear2018-2019en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeconferenceObject-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2732-4780-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

1
checked on Nov 6, 2023

Page view(s)

337
Last Week
2
Last month
4
checked on Jan 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.