Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1404
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJones, Steve A.-
dc.contributor.authorGiddens, Don P.-
dc.contributor.authorAnayiotos, Andreas-
dc.contributor.otherΑναγιωτός, Ανδρέας-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-05T10:14:42Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T05:22:53Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T10:12:22Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-05T10:14:42Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T05:22:53Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T10:12:22Z-
dc.date.issued1994-02-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1994, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 98-106en_US
dc.identifier.issn15288951-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1404-
dc.description.abstractTo investigate the role of a compliant wall to the near wall hemodynamic flowfield, two models of the carotid bifurcation were constructed. Both were of identical internal geometries, however, one was made of compliant material which produced approximately the same degree of wall motion as that occurring in vivo while the other one was rigid. The inner geometries were formed from the same mold so that the configurations are directly comparable. Each model was placed in a pulsatile flow system that produced a physiologic flow waveform. Velocity was measured with a single component Laser system and wall shear rate was estimated from near wall data. Wall motion in the compliant model was measured by a wall motion transducer and the maximum diameter change varied between 4-7 percent in the model with the greatest change at the axis intersection. The mean shear stress in the compliant model was observed to be smaller by about 30 percent at most locations. The variation in peak shear stress was greater and occasionally reached as much as 100 percent with the compliant model consistently having smaller positive and negative peaks. The separation point was seen to move further upstream in the compliant cast. The modified flowfield in the presence of a compliant wall can then be important in the hemodynamic theory of atherogenesis. To investigate the role of a compliant wall to the near wall hemodynamic flowfield, two models of the carotid bifurcation were constructed. Both were of identical internal geometries, however, one was made of compliant materials which produced approximately the same degree of wall motion as that occurring in vivo while the other one was rigid. The inner geometries were formed from the same mold so that the configurations are directly comparable. Each model was placed in a pulsatile flow system that produced a physiologic flow waveform. Velocity was measured with a single component Laser system and wall shear rate was estimated from near wall data. Wall motion in the compliant model was measured by a wall motion transducer and the maximum diameter change varied between 4-7 percent in the model with the greatest change at the axis intersection. The mean shear stress in the compliant model was observed to be smaller by about 30 percent at most locations. The variation in peak shear stress was greater and occasionally reached as much as 100 percent with the compliant model consistently having smaller positive and negative peaks. The separation point was seen to move further upstream in the compliant cast. The modified flow field in the presence of a compliant wall can the be important in the hemodynamic theory of atherogenesis.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of biomechanical engineeringen_US
dc.rights© American Society of Mechanical Engineersen_US
dc.subjectCardiovascular systemen_US
dc.subjectTransducersen_US
dc.subjectHemodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectBlooden_US
dc.titleShear stress at a compliant model of the human carotid bifurcationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.affiliationUniversity of Alabama at Birminghamen
dc.collaborationUniversity of Alabama at Birminghamen_US
dc.collaborationJohns Hopkins Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Chicago Medical Centeren_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.2895710en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume116en_US
cut.common.academicyear1995-1996en_US
dc.identifier.spage98en_US
dc.identifier.epage106en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1528-8951-
crisitem.journal.publisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4471-7604-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

76
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

64
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 10

523
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.