Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1390
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorElmahdi, Abdelaziz M.-
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Brent E.-
dc.contributor.authorAnayiotos, Andreas-
dc.contributor.otherΑναγιωτός, Ανδρέας-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-04T13:16:56Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T05:22:51Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T10:11:49Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-04T13:16:56Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T05:22:51Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T10:11:49Z-
dc.date.issued1997-06-27-
dc.identifier.citationUltrasound in Medicine and Biology, 1997, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 231-244en_US
dc.identifier.issn03015629-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1390-
dc.description.abstractAn accurate and reliable method of regurgitant flow calculation is currently unavailable. The goal of this study was to define a new general method of flow calculation for orifices of different aspect ratios. The success of the method relies on matching the imaged flow field distribution obtained by color flow mapping (CFM) to a three-dimensional (3D) numerical flow field distribution of known geometry. The flow field in three orifices of identical cross-sectional area with aspect ratios of I (circular), 2 and 4 (elliptical) was evaluated by: (a) CFM, (b) 3D echocardiographic imaging, and (c) 3D finite element modeling (FEM). The orifice shape and size were accurately estimated by 3D echocardiographic imaging. FEM showed that the normalized centerline velocity profile of the flow field depends on the orifice aspect ratio. CFM provided a good description of the centerline profile for each case. For a given distance from the orifice center, the equivelocity contour surface area increases with increasing aspect ratio. A simple flow calculation scheme was developed to calculate regurgitant flow independent of orifice shape. This improved method showed better results than previous studies and may prove to be advantageous when analyzing in vivo flow fields with complex geometries. An accurate and reliable method of regurgitant flow calculation is currently unavailable. The goal of this study was to define a new general method of flow calculation for orifices of different aspect ratios. The success of the method relies on matching the imaged flow field distribution obtained by color flow mapping (CFM) to a three-dimensional (3D) numerical flow field distribution of known geometry. The flow field in three orifices of identical cross-sectional area with aspect ratios of 1 (circular), 2 and 4 (elliptical) was evaluated by: (a) CFM, (b) 3D echocardiographic imaging, and (c) 3D finite element modeling (FEM). The orifice shape and size were accurately estimated by 3D echocardiographic imaging. FEM showed that the normalized centerline velocity profile of the flow field depends on the orifice aspect ratio. CFM provided a good description of the centerline profile for each case. For a given distance from the orifice center, the equivelocity contour surface area increases with increasing aspect ratio. A simple flow calculation scheme was developed to calculate regurgitant flow independent of orifice shape. This improved method showed better results than previous studies and may prove to be advantageous when analyzing in vivo flow fields with complex geometries.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUltrasound in Medicine and Biologyen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectComputer simulationen_US
dc.subjectEchocardiographyen_US
dc.subjectHemodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic imagingen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic imagingen_US
dc.titleAn improved flow evaluation scheme in orifices of different aspect ratiosen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.affiliationUniversity of Alabama at Birminghamen
dc.collaborationUniversity of Alabama at Birminghamen_US
dc.collaborationBirmingham Veteran's Administration Medical Centeren_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0301-5629(96)00228-1en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume23en_US
cut.common.academicyear1996-1997en_US
dc.identifier.spage231en_US
dc.identifier.epage244en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0301-5629-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4471-7604-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 14, 2023

Page view(s) 20

461
Last Week
1
Last month
6
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.