Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/13642
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKleanthous, Akis-
dc.contributor.authorPaton, Robert A.-
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Fiona M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T15:33:56Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-16T15:33:56Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-11-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Social Economics, 2019, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 309-323en_US
dc.identifier.issn03068293-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The financial crisis of 2008 resulted in calls for change. Commentators suggested that co-operatives, in particular credit unions, could provide accountability and sustainability through their open governance and mutual status. However, such suggestions assumed that co-operative principles and practice continued to underpin the efficacy of co-operative banking, and that credit unions, one of the most prevalent forms of co-operative banking, could offer a viable financial alternative. Instead, in the case of Cyprus, the financial crisis and the associated aftershocks triggered the nationalisation and demutualisation of credit unions. This prompted the researchers to question both the viability of a co-operative banking future and the extent to which co-operative principles were shaping decision making, governance, accountability and sustainability. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: A case study approach was adopted to explore the degree to which co-operative principles still shaped credit union thinking and stakeholder relationships. Findings: As is the case elsewhere within the co-operative movement, the findings point the fact that governance is weaken by the low membership participation and that the principles are no longer universally applied. Credit unions, if not co-operative banking, may not offer the financial assurances that commentators have called for. Moreover, the guiding principles may no longer be embedded within the fabric of the movement. Practical implications: Findings are important for practitioners/supervisory body as they highlight possible impacts on co-operative’ future and especially on their governance model and level of autonomy and independence in case of state intervention. Originality/value: The research undertaken is original as it is the first time credit unions in Cyprus were examined for adherence to co-operative principles.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Social Economicsen_US
dc.rights© Emeralden_US
dc.subjectCo-operative principlesen_US
dc.subjectCo-operativesen_US
dc.subjectCredit unionsen_US
dc.subjectFinancial crisisen_US
dc.subjectGovernanceen_US
dc.titleCredit unions, co-operatives, sustainability and accountability in a time of change: A case study of credit unions in Cyprusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Glasgowen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEconomics and Businessen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJSE-06-2017-0231en_US
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume46en_US
cut.common.academicyear2018-2019en_US
dc.identifier.spage309en_US
dc.identifier.epage323en_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0306-8293-
crisitem.journal.publisherEmerald-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

303
Last Week
3
Last month
6
checked on Jul 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.