Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/13608
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuarracino, Ilaria-
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, James-
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Alba-
dc.contributor.authorKalogirou, Soteris A.-
dc.contributor.authorEkins-Daukes, Nicholas J.-
dc.contributor.authorMarkides, Christos N.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-12T20:21:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-12T20:21:55Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-15-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Energy, 2019, vol. 240, pp. 1014-1030en_US
dc.identifier.issn03062619-
dc.description.abstractHybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) collectors have been proposed for the combined generation of electricity and heat from the same area. In order to predict accurately the electrical and thermal energy generation from hybrid PVT systems, it is necessary that both the steady-state and dynamic performance of the collectors is considered. This work focuses on the performance characterisation of non-concentrating PVT collectors under outdoor conditions. A novel aspect concerns the application of existing methods, adapted from relevant international standards for flat plate and evacuated tube solar-thermal collectors, to PVT collectors for which there is no formally established testing methodology at present. Three different types of PVT collector are tested, with a focus on the design parameters that affect their electrical and thermal performance during operation. Among other results, we show that a PVT collector suffers a 10% decrease in thermal efficiency when the electricity conversion is close to the maximum power point compared to open-circuit mode, and that a poor thermal contact between the PV laminate and the copper absorber can lead to a significant deterioration in thermal performance. The addition of a glass cover improves the thermal efficiency, but causes electrical performance losses that vary with the glass transmittance and the solar incidence angle. The reduction in electrical efficiency at large incidence angles is more significant than that due to elevated temperatures representative of water-heating applications. Dynamic performance is characterised by imposing a step change in irradiance in order to quantify the collector time constant and effective heat capacity. This paper demonstrates that PVT collectors are characterised by a slow thermal response in comparison to ordinary flat plate solar-thermal collectors, due to the additional thermal mass of the PV layer. A time constant of ∼8 min is measured for a commercial PVT module, compared to <2 min for a flat plate solar-thermal collector. It is also concluded that the use of a lumped, first-order dynamic model to represent the thermal mass of the PVT collector is not appropriate under certain irradiation regimes and may lead to inaccurate predictions of the system performance. This paper outlines a procedure for the testing and characterisation of solar collectors, provides valuable steady-state and dynamic performance characterisation data for various PVT collector designs, and also provides a framework for the application of this data in a system model to provide annual performance predictions in a range of geographical settings.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Energyen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectHybrid PVT collectorsen_US
dc.subjectSolar collectorsen_US
dc.subjectCollector performance analysisen_US
dc.subjectExperimental characterisation of solar collectorsen_US
dc.subjectDynamic modellingen_US
dc.titleSystematic testing of hybrid PV-thermal (PVT) solar collectors in steady-state and dynamic outdoor conditionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationImperial College Londonen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationImperial College Londonen_US
dc.subject.categoryEnvironmental Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.049en_US
dc.relation.volume240en_US
cut.common.academicyear2018-2019en_US
dc.identifier.spage1014en_US
dc.identifier.epage1030en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0306-2619-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4497-0602-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

99
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

82
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

413
Last Week
2
Last month
8
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.