Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1286
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForster, Helga-
dc.contributor.authorAdaskaveg, James-
dc.contributor.authorKanetis, Loukas-
dc.contributor.otherΚανέτης, Λούκας-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-10T11:04:08Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-16T06:25:01Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T09:17:33Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-10T11:04:08Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-16T06:25:01Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T09:17:33Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationPhytopathology, 2004, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 163-170en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031949X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1286-
dc.description.abstractA new technique, the spiral gradient dilution method, was evaluated for determining 50% effective concentrations (EC50 values) of fungicides for the inhibition of mycelial growth and conidial germination of various fungi. In this method, an agar medium is plated with a fungicide solution by means of a spiral plater, which applies the fungicide in a 2.5-log dilution in a continuous radial concentration gradient. Fungal inoculum is then placed along radial lines across the gradient. After incubation of the plates, distinct growth shapes were observed in different fungus-fungicide interactions. Mycelial growth responses to increasing fungicide concentrations ranged from abrupt to gradual transitions. Conidial germination responses were similar; in addition, distinct zones of confluent growth, nonconfluent growth, and outlier colonies were also identified, depending on the fungus-fungicide interaction. The fungicide concentration at the radial distance at which 50% reduction of growth or spore germination occurred, compared with growth or germination on unamended media, was calculated by a computer program. EC50 values were obtained for mycelial growth in 22 fungus-fungicide interactions and for conidial germination in five interactions. The fungi evaluated were members of the Zygomycota, Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Deuteromycota. Nine fungicides, belonging to six different chemical classes, were tested. EC50 values were compared with those obtained by the traditional agar dilution method. In linear regression analyses of the two methods, the models were highly significant (P < 0.01), and coefficients of determination (r2) were 0.92 for the mycelial growth assays and 0.94 for the conidial germination assays. Regression slopes were not significantly different from 1 (P > 0.05) with optimal program settings in the software. Estimated bias, coefficients of variation, and actual confidence intervals for the regression slope were 13.5%, 6.5%, and 1.14 ± 0.14 for the mycelial growth assays and 7.5%, 14.5%, and 1.08 ± 0.37 for the conidial germination assays. These analyses indicate that the spiral gradient dilution method is accurate and precise compared with the agar dilution method for calculating EC50 values of fungicides in continuous growth responses to fungicide concentration gradientsen_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhytopathologyen_US
dc.rights© The American Phytopathological Societyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectFungicidesen_US
dc.subjectAscomycetesen_US
dc.subjectBacteriaen_US
dc.subjectBasidiomycetesen_US
dc.subjectFungien_US
dc.subjectFungi imperfectien_US
dc.subjectPlant diseasesen_US
dc.subjectOpen access publishingen_US
dc.titleSpiral gradient dilution, a rapid method for determining growth responses and 50% effective concentration values in fungus-fungicide interactionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.affiliationUniversity of Californiaen
dc.collaborationUniversity of Californiaen_US
dc.subject.categoryAGRICULTURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgricultural Biotechnologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Agricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsHybrid Open Accessen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.2.163en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume94en_US
cut.common.academicyear2004-2005en_US
dc.identifier.spage163en_US
dc.identifier.epage170en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1869-558X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1943-7684-
crisitem.journal.publisherAmerican Phytopathological Society-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

69
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

70
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

437
Last Week
2
Last month
13
checked on May 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons