Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1267
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWadee, M. Ahmer-
dc.contributor.authorTheofanous, Marios-
dc.contributor.authorYiatros, Stylianos-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-05T10:44:33Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T09:05:13Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-05T10:44:33Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T09:05:13Z-
dc.date.issued2010-03-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 2010, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 111–120en_US
dc.identifier.issn00207462-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1267-
dc.description.abstractAnalytical models with geometric non-linearities accounting for interactions between local and global instability modes leading to localized buckling in sandwich struts are formulated. For the core material response, two increasingly sophisticated bending models are compared against each other: Timoshenko beam theory (TBT) and Reddy–Bickford beam theory (RBT). Numerical solutions of the analytical models are validated with the commercial finite element code ABAQUS. It is found that there is a small but significant difference in the critical load between the two models and that the previously obtained solution slightly underestimates the linear buckling strength. More importantly, it is found that the RBT model predicts the onset of interactive buckling before the TBT model and, according to the results from the finite element study, matches the actual behaviour of a strut in both its initial and advanced postbuckling states with excellent correlation.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Non-Linear Mechanicsen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectStructural stabilityen_US
dc.subjectBifurcationen_US
dc.subjectInteractive bucklingen_US
dc.subjectLocalizationen_US
dc.subjectShear deformationen_US
dc.subjectComposite structuresen_US
dc.titleComparative studies of localized buckling in sandwich struts with different core bending modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationImperial College Londonen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewPeer Revieweden
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.10.001en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume45en_US
cut.common.academicyear2009-2010en_US
dc.identifier.spage111en_US
dc.identifier.epage120en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0020-7462-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4803-6585-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

41
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

39
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 20

488
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Nov 7, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.