Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/12466
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaterakis, Fotis-
dc.contributor.authorMarouchos, Christos-
dc.contributor.authorDarwish, Mohammed K.-
dc.contributor.authorNafpaktitis, Drosos-
dc.contributor.otherΜαρούχος, Χρίστος-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-01T07:05:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-01T07:05:21Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-19-
dc.identifier.citation52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference, 2017, Crete, Greece, 28-31 Augusten_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/12466-
dc.description.abstractA conventional 3-level PWM Inverter and a Cascaded Multilevel Inverter, both rated at 230Vrms voltage output and 3KW are analysed using the Switching Function. The PWM signal for the 3-level inverter is derived by applying the Switching Function Technique to the equal area principle. For the Cascaded Multilevel Inverter the Switching Function Technique is initially applied to each H-bridge, and then added to derive the overall Switching Function for the Multilevel Inverter output. A new technique is employed to derive the pulse width of each H-bridge converter in order to construct the output voltage. Voltage expressions of the output voltages are derived for both topologies. The switching frequency is chosen to be the same for both inverters. To ensure the same number of commutations over a fundamental cycle for both inverters, the levels of the Multilevel Inverter must be properly selected to meet the PWM frequency of the conventional inverter. Frequency spectrum and expressions of THD of the output voltage are derived. The two inverters are compared in terms of THD and harmonic content of the output voltage. The efficiency is concluded from the number of switching instances and other parameters of the circuit.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© 2017 IEEE.en_US
dc.subjectEqual areasen_US
dc.subjectMultilevel inverteren_US
dc.subjectPWMen_US
dc.subjectSwitching functionen_US
dc.subjectTHDen_US
dc.titleComparison of a PWM inverter and a multilevel inverter using the switching function analysis for harmonic content and efficiencyen_US
dc.typeConference Papersen_US
dc.collaborationTechnological Educational Institute of Athensen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationBrunel Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryElectrical Engineering - Electronic Engineering - Information Engineeringen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Universities Power Engineering Conferenceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231896en_US
cut.common.academicyear2017-2018en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f-
item.openairetypeconferenceObject-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Informatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 5

3
checked on Nov 6, 2023

Page view(s) 20

434
Last Week
2
Last month
9
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.