Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1112
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHannafin, Robert D.-
dc.contributor.authorIoannou, Andri-
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-19T06:47:42Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T08:49:45Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-19T06:47:42Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T08:49:45Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationQuarterly Review of Distance Education, 2008, vol. 9, iss.4, p. 415en_US
dc.identifier.issn15283518-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1112-
dc.description.abstractCourse management systems (CMSs) support thousands of courses at colleges and universities worldwide, delivering fully online courses as well as supplementing traditional face-to-face instruction. While quite a few studies have focused on the numerous benefits and technological advantages of CMSs, there is a paucity of empirical work focused on user attitudes about the efficiency and ease of use of CMSs, and perceived usefulness of potential additional features. We developed an attitudinal scale to better define and quantify these constructs. We piloted the survey with 234 college students who used WebCT Vista as a supplement to a face-to-face course. In this article we describe the development and initial validation of the scale. Since there is so little empirical work in this area, validating the instrument and identifying attitude factors should contribute to future research in this fast-growing arena. We further discus findings from our quantitative and qualitative data that provide evidence that CMSs are still evolving tools, and need accommodations and improvements.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofQuarterly Review of Distance Educationen_US
dc.rights© IAPen_US
dc.subjectOnline coursesen_US
dc.subjectComputer assisted instructionen_US
dc.subjectEducational innovationsen_US
dc.subjectUniversities & collegesen_US
dc.titleDeficiencies of course management systems: Do students care?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.linkhttps://www.infoagepub.com/quarterly-review-of-distance-education.htmlen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Connecticuten_US
dc.subject.categoryComputer and Information Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewPeer Revieweden
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume9en_US
cut.common.academicyear2007-2008en_US
dc.identifier.spage415en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1528-3518-
crisitem.journal.publisherIAP-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Multimedia and Graphic Arts-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Fine and Applied Arts-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3570-6578-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Fine and Applied Arts-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

383
Last Week
2
Last month
2
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.