Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/11018
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSuhonen, Riitta A.-
dc.contributor.authorStolt, Minna-
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Agneta C.-
dc.contributor.authorKatajisto, Jouko-
dc.contributor.authorLemonidou, Chryssoula-
dc.contributor.authorPatiraki, Elisabeth-
dc.contributor.authorSjövall, Katarina-
dc.contributor.authorCharalambous, Andreas-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-04T09:55:50Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-04T09:55:50Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2018, vol. 27, no. 1-2, pp. 306-316en_US
dc.identifier.issn13652702-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/11018-
dc.description.abstractAims and objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the associations between patients' gender, education, health status in relation to assessments of patient-centred quality and individuality in care and trust in nurses for those <65 (working age) and ≥65 years (older people). Background: Patients' assessments of the quality of care they receive are essential for the development of the provision of patient care and services. Previous studies have revealed age of the patient is associated with their assessment of care quality attributes. Design: The study employed a cross-sectional, multicultural comparative survey design. Methods: The data were collected using questionnaires among hospitalised cancer patients (N = 876, n = 599, 68%) in four European countries: Greece, Cyprus, Sweden and Finland. The data were divided into two subgroups based on age (cut point 65 years) and were analysed statistically. Results: Cancer patients' age, gender and level of education were not related to their assessments of care quality attributes: person-centred care quality, individuality in care and trust in nurses. Subgroup analysis of the older adults and those of working age showed clear associations with patients' assessments of quality-of-care attributes and perceived health status. The lower the perceived health status, the lower the assessment of care quality attributes. Discussion: The results suggest that the cancer itself is the strongest determinant of the care delivered, rather than any patient characteristics, such as age, education or gender. Perceived health status, in association with cancer patient assessments of care quality attributes, may be useful in the development of patient-centred, individualised care strategies alongside a stronger focus on people instead of cancer-care-related processes and duties. Conclusions: Health status was the only factor associated with cancer patients' assessments of care quality attributes. Cancer itself may be the strongest determinant of the care quality perceptions, rather than any patient characteristics. Relevance to clinical practice: The findings of this study have implications for cancer care professionals in terms of patient assessment and care planning. The measures may be useful in assessing quality of cancer nursing care.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Nursingen_US
dc.rights© Wileyen_US
dc.subjectAgeen_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.subjectHealth statusen_US
dc.subjectInternationalen_US
dc.subjectPatienten_US
dc.subjectPerson-centred careen_US
dc.subjectQualityen_US
dc.subjectSurveyen_US
dc.titleCancer patients' perceptions of quality-of-care attributes—Associations with age, perceived health status, gender and educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Turkuen_US
dc.collaborationTurku University Hospitalen_US
dc.collaborationKristianstad Universityen_US
dc.collaborationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athensen_US
dc.collaborationLund Universityen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationCity of Turku Welfare Divisionen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryFinlanden_US
dc.countrySwedenen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.13902en_US
dc.relation.issue1-2en_US
dc.relation.volume27en_US
cut.common.academicyear2017-2018en_US
dc.identifier.spage306en_US
dc.identifier.epage316en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1365-2702-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4050-031X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 1

16
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 21, 2023

Page view(s) 50

419
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.