Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1072
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoyer, Mark A.-
dc.contributor.authorUrlacher, Brian-
dc.contributor.authorHudson, Natalie Florea-
dc.contributor.authorNiv-Solomon, Anat-
dc.contributor.authorJanik, Laura L.-
dc.contributor.authorButler, Michael J.-
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Scott W.-
dc.contributor.authorIoannou, Andri-
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-18T13:21:37Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T08:45:01Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-18T13:21:37Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T08:45:01Z-
dc.date.issued2009-03-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Studies Quarterly, 2009, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 23–47en_US
dc.identifier.issn14682478-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1072-
dc.description.abstractIncreasingly, scholars have taken note of the tendency for women to conceptualize issues such as security, peace, war, and the use of military force in different ways than their male counterparts. These divergent conceptualizations in turn affect the way women interact with the world around them and make decisions. Moreover, research across a variety of fields suggests that providing women a greater voice in international negotiations may bring a fresh outlook to dispute resolution. Using experimental data collected by the GlobalEd Project, this article provides substantial support for hypotheses positing that females generate significantly different processes and outcomes in a negotiation context. These findings occur both in terms of female negotiation behavior and the impact of females as negotiation facilitators/mediators.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Studies Quarterlyen_US
dc.rights© Oxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectNegotiationen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.titleGender and Negotiation: Some Experimental Findings from an International Negotiation Simulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Connecticuten_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of North Dakotaen_US
dc.collaborationClark Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Daytonen_US
dc.subject.categorySociologyen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewPeer Revieweden
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldHumanitiesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.01522.xen_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume53en_US
cut.common.academicyear2008-2009en_US
dc.identifier.spage23en_US
dc.identifier.epage47en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1468-2478-
crisitem.journal.publisherOxford University Press-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Multimedia and Graphic Arts-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Fine and Applied Arts-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3570-6578-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Fine and Applied Arts-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

49
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

29
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 10

525
Last Week
4
Last month
15
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.